Education Technology Plan
July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2011

|
County Name: |
Butte |
|
District Name: |
Biggs Unified School District |
|
CDS Code: |
0461408 |
|
District Phone Number: |
530-868-5825 |
|
Ed Tech Plan Contact Name: |
Dave Niemeyer |
|
Contact Title: |
District Technology Coordinator |
|
Contact Address: |
300 B Street |
|
Contact City & Zip Code: |
Biggs, CA 95917 |
|
Contact Phone Number: |
530-868-5825 x273 |
|
Contact FAX#: |
530-868-1727 |
|
Contact Email: |
dniemeye@biggs.org |
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments 1
Appendix I: Benchmark Review Form 2
District Summary and Plan Duration
(Criteria Item 1) 5 - 7
Stakeholders Involvement (Criteria Item 2) 7
Curriculum Driven Technology Goals
(Criteria Item 3) 11
Professional Development and Implementation
(Criteria Item 4) 33
Infrastructure, Hardware, Technical Support, and Software
(Criteria Item 5) 43
Funding and Budget
(Criteria Item 6) 50
Monitoring and Evaluation
(Criteria Item 7) 55
Effective Collaborative Strategies With Adult Literacy Providers to Maximize
the Use of Technology Criterion
(Criteria Item 8) 57
Effective, Research-Based Methods, Strategies, and Criteria
(Criteria Item 9) 58
Appendix C: Criteria for EETT Funded Education Technology Plans 62
Acknowledgments
School Board of Trustees
Vickie Speegle, President
Mike Felkins, Vice President
Donna Crowhurst, Clerk
Rocky Howell
Cadie Honan
District Educational Technology Plan Team
District Personnel
District Superintendent
Dr. Lee Funk
Technology Personnel
Dave Niemeyer
Financial Personnel
Pam Ragan
Site Administrators
Ralph Vandro, Principal, Biggs High School
Candelaria Leon, Principal, Biggs Elementary School
Teachers
Char Locey, Richvale Elementary School
Scott Gates, Community Day School
Chris Hull, Biggs Middle School
Lindsey Roffey, Bigg High School
Parents / Students
Luis Oliverez, BHS student and lead student technology assistant
Government Agencies
CTAP Region 2, EdTech Plan Coordinator – Nancy Silva
Appendix I – Education Technology Plan Benchmark Review
California Department of Education EETT-F02BR Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT)
Education Technology Plan Benchmark Review
EETT-F02BR (rev. 09/04)
Education Technology Plan Benchmark Review
For the grant period ending June 30, 2006
|
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION: |
|
CDS # _ 0461408 _____________________________________ |
|
Applicant Name: Biggs Unified School District |
|
The No Child Left Behind Act requires each Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) grant recipient to measure the performance of their educational technology implementation plan. To adhere to these requirements, describe the progress towards the goals and benchmarks in your education technology plan as specified below. The information provided will enable the technology plan reviewer better to evaluate the revised technology plan and will serve as a basis should the district be selected for a random EETT review. Include this signed document with your revised education technology plan submitted to your regional California Technology Assistance Project (CTAP) office. |
|
|
|
95% of our staff, teaching and administrative, has received training on our currently-use Student Information System, namely Aeries and the interface, ABI. All teachers use the technology to report attendance and all administrators and counselors use it to access student information. The coordinated use of this program has also resulted in improved communications with students and parents regarding student performance and attendance. We have met or exceeded our goal concerning the on-line teacher technology survey. 95% of site-based staff within the district (teaching and administrative) have completed the on-line CTAP technology use and proficiency survey annually. The goals concerning teacher-completion of the CTAP 100 and other courses have not been met. We have not participated in the CTAP course program due to funding shortages and pitfalls in negotiations in motivating and paying teacher stipends for this program. We had anticipated that the main ingredient of the technology plan and use of EETT funds would be to provide leadership and stipends for teachers participating in the CTAP courses. With long-term stalemated negotiations with the teachers and district, the stipends were not allocated (stipend allocation requires bargaining unit negotiations). We have, however, participated in a program just as viable. Last year we sent 5 teachers (representing each of our school sites) to the summer technology in-service at CSU Chico, which provided extremely productive training and leadership for these teachers. They now function as technology leaders at their respective school sites, which was one of the goals of the CTAP goals for our technology plan. Although we have not met the long-term objective of having 75% of our teachers participate in the CTAP 100 or equivalent course (Personal Technology Proficiency), we are making strides at providing a cadre of motivated and trained staff with at least one leader at each of our sites. |
|
The applicant certifies that the information described above is accurate as of the date of this document. Should the applicant be selected for a random EETT review, the information stated above will be supported by adequate supporting documentation. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above certifications.
For CDE Use Only Date Added: ____________________ Selected For Random Review: __________________________ Comments:
PRINTED NAME OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
SIGNATURE DATE |
District Profile
The Biggs Unified School District is located about 70 miles north of Sacramento in the north valley. The district covers 192 square miles. There are two separate elementary schools (K – 6) with one in the city of Biggs and one smaller elementary school in the nearby town of Richvale. While both Biggs Middle School (7 - 8) and Biggs High School (9 - 12) are on the same campus, each maintains a separate program. The District office houses not only the district office personnel but also the Independent Study, and the Intermediate and Secondary Community Day School Programs as well. A "Biggs Charter School" was recently started, but there is no data on that site as yet, so as data and attendance numbers are generated, that site will soon be included on future revisions of this technology plan.
The following data offers a snapshot of our district during the 2004-05 school year from the Ed Data (http://www.ed-data.k12.ca.us/welcome.asp ) and Dataquest (http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ ) web sites.
|
Biggs Unified School District 2004-05 School Data |
||||
|
|
Number of Schools |
Enrollment |
Full-Time Equivalent Teachers |
Pupil-Teacher Ratio |
|
Elementary |
2 |
388 |
20.0 |
19.4 |
|
Middle |
1 |
137 |
4.7 |
29.1 |
|
High School |
1 |
251 |
11.3 |
22.2 |
|
Alt. Ed / Community Day |
2 |
11 |
2.0 |
5.5 |
|
Total |
6 |
787 |
38.0 |
28.7 |
|
Biggs Unified School District, Students by Ethnicity 2004-05 |
||
|
District |
||
|
Enrollment |
Percent of Total |
|
|
American Indian |
4 |
.5% |
|
Asian |
16 |
2.0% |
|
Pacific Islander |
0 |
0% |
|
Filipino |
0 |
0% |
|
Hispanic |
249 |
31.6% |
|
African American |
3 |
.4% |
|
White |
512 |
65.1% |
|
Multiple/No Response |
3 |
.4% |
|
Total |
787 |
100% |
|
Biggs Unified District, Student & Teacher Data 2004-05 |
|
|
English Learners |
147 ( 18.7 %) |
|
Fluent-English-Proficient Students |
64 ( 8.1 %) |
|
Students Redesignated FEP |
0 ( 0.0 %) |
|
Graduates (prior year) |
49 |
|
UC/CSU Elig Grads (prior year) |
7 ( 14.3 %) |
|
Dropouts (prior year, grade 9-12) |
0 |
|
1 Yr Drop Rate (prior year, grade 9-12) |
0 |
|
4 Yr Drop Rate (prior year, grade 9-12) |
0 |
|
% Fully Credentialed Teachers |
( 97.7% ) |
|
Pupil Teacher Ratio |
28.7 |
|
Avg. Class Size |
26.2 |
|
Free or Reduced Price Meals |
62.1% |
Education Technology Plan Overview
Biggs Unified School District's mission is to prepare every student for their future, be it vocational or higher education. Biggs Unified School District is committed to teaching all students the 21st Century knowledge and skills they need as well as respect for the world they inhabit and for all humanity.
The mission of technology at BUSD is to incorporate technology into the curricular program of individual classrooms at every grade level. To this end, the BUSD technological goals are to:
Facilitate student learning
Provide instructional support
Prepare students for the workplace
Access curricular information
Increase effective, timely staff communication to parents and community.
Increase efficiency of management tasks
Develop student and staff skills for technological literacy
Develop students to be "life-long learners" with the use of technology
Provide leadership to the staff and help allocate/manage the technology budget.
Monitor the effectiveness of technology uses in the district and provide for program modification as needed.
Technology brings new approaches to teaching and learning that provide more opportunities to ensure that all students can successfully engage and participate in an academically rigorous environment.
Biggs Unified School District is committed to the ongoing development of infrastructure, hardware, software, and quality professional development related to these resources in order to implement all of these efforts successfully within the learning environments of our children.
Biggs Unified School District is committed to appropriately integrating technology into all areas of the curriculum and dedicated to the acquisition and support of effective educational technology that provides teachers and students real-world contexts for learning, connections to larger learning communities, and opportunities to individualize and apply learning. Implementing technology-based solutions into all functions and processes of instruction, management and communication is the responsibility of district and school site curriculum and technology leaders. Specifically our role is to:
Orchestrate the implementation of our technology plan components with stakeholders.
Keep the technology funding flowing and manage the technology budgets.
Keep the infrastructure, hardware, and software up to date.
Provide high-quality service to users on an ongoing basis.
Implement technology solutions that will make accountable differences in instruction, assessment, and management of students as well as improve communication and collaboration.
This revised EdTech Plan is the result of many hours of discussion, learning, and collaboration among a diverse representation of administrators, teachers, parents, and business partners. The original District Technology Stakeholder Committee was formed in the fall of 2000. The committee developed a comprehensive, research-based Education Technology Plan for the 2003-2006 school years that was reviewed, revised, and adopted by the district school board and subsequently approved by the California Department of Education in 2003. We are optimistically moving forward with this updated tech plan.
Biggs Unified School District’s Education Technology Plan is intended to serve as both a guide for technology related decision-making and an instrument to monitor and evaluate progress toward identified goals and objectives. An updated assessment of district technology status, needs, and resources has been completed for each section of our revised tech plan and has guided the development of our new technology goals, objectives and implementation activities. Our goals and objectives were established to meet the identified needs of integrating technology to improve student learning, providing equitable technology access and support, providing secure, timely information flow between home, school, and community, and providing coordinated, ongoing high quality educational technology professional development.
1a. Plan Duration
The plan should guide the district’s use of education technology for the next 3-5 years.
The Biggs Unified School District educational technology plan covers five years, from July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2011. It will serve as the primary tool to guide the district’s acquisition, sustainability, and integration of technology to support the district’s curricular goals. This plan will be monitored by district curriculum, data, and technology coordinators, school administrators and school media specialists during regular education support meetings and reviewed and revised annually by technology stakeholders after the state releases achievement data for district school sites. Any modifications required through such review will be communicated to both the district Superintendent and school board. The district director of Information Technology will then work with the Superintendent to implement any required revisions directly with site-based administrators.
2a. Stakeholders
Description of how a variety of stakeholders from within the school district and the community-at-large participated in the planning process.
Our District’s original Educational Technology Planning Team has become our implementation oversight team. The group is comprised of district and site representatives who are responsible for implementing the plan, including district curriculum, data, and information technology staff; site administrators, teachers, students, and parents as well as partners in higher education, community non-profit groups, and local businesses.
The team originally convened in the 2000-01 school year to serve as a strategic planning committee for technology in the development of our original technology plan. Since then, the team has met as needed with the core technology advisory team and sub groups meeting more frequently as needed. A district email contact list provides stakeholders with a mechanism for ongoing input and updates regarding the objectives, funding, budgets, and curricular guidelines contained within our technology plan. In addition, progress is reviewed at regular district education support meetings with site administration to:
Evaluate the status of the current technology plan and make adjustments if needed.
Monitor progress on current technology projects.
Gather and evaluate district technology data with regard to hardware, wiring, resources, professional development and projects.
Collect and analyze survey and technology data.
Identify and update common technology needs and issues.
This plan builds upon and incorporates the work of previous planning committees and district plans.
As stakeholders review technology plan outcome and process data, the following key questions are addressed:
Are the district and schools’ visions for student success aligned to today's knowledge-based, Digital Age? Are administrators committed to the vision?
Is student academic achievement improving where technology is being used effectively?
Are students demonstrating proficiency in technological literacy?
Are educators proficient in implementing, assessing and supporting a variety of effective practices for teaching and learning?
Do students and school staff have robust access to technology - anytime, anywhere - to support effective designs for teaching and learning?
Is the digital divide being addressed through resources and strategies that ensure that all students are engaging in an educational program aligned to the district’s vision of technology integration?
Stakeholder Groups
District Curriculum Personnel – the Superintendent (other curriculum personnel include appointees by the site administrators and include site lead teachers as well)
Design & Implementation Roles: Representatives on our Tech Plan team promote, direct, and facilitate the technology team’s development of broad and inclusive goals and objectives for curriculum, resources, and operations that include technology. Our curriculum personnel integrate 21st century skills into the overall vision for student achievement and into every aspect of learning, teaching, and administrating. Curriculum personnel define clear and specific standards-aligned academic objectives by grade and subject; support research-based best practices and instructional programs; develop student assessment and data monitoring systems and monitor school performance and make adjustments based on school performance.
District Technology Personnel – the District Technology Coordinator
Design & Implementation Roles: Representatives on our Tech Plan team provide overall coordination of the technology implementation and oversight team, funding resources, and the implementation of the goals and objectives set forth in this updated technology plan.
District Financial Personnel – the Director Fiscal Services and staff
Design & Implementation Roles: Representatives on our Tech Plan team provide coordination of technology funds and budget issues.
Site Administration – Site Principals
Design & Implementation Roles: Representatives on our Tech Plan team provide site-based updates on tech plan implementation and needs; monitor teacher performance and student learning; make adjustments based on teacher and student performance; ensure the use of adopted materials, research-based best practices and instructional programs; provide input on how technology can better support the teaching of standards-aligned academic objectives.
Site Teachers – Teacher-representation from our Elementary, Middle, High School, Alternative and Continuation Schools
Design & Implementation Roles: Representatives on our Tech Plan team provide input on efforts and outcomes using research-based technology programs and practices to support the district curricular goals and academic content standards and improve teaching and learning.
Parents / Students – Parents of children enrolled in our Elementary, Middle, High School, Alternative and Continuation Schools and students.
Design & Implementation Roles: Representatives on our Tech Plan team provide input on the district and schools’ efforts to integrate technology and 21st century skills in the standards-aligned curriculum. Parents and students advocate for equity in access to technology and the opportunity to master core subjects and 21st century skills.
Government Agencies – representatives from the California Technology Assistance Project (CTAP) Region 2.
Design & Implementation Roles: Representatives on our Tech Plan team offered technical assistance with: the data analyses and revision of our goals and objectives; professional development planning and implementation; EETT Formula Funding; E-rate; compliance issues; hardware, software, and infrastructure.
Community Groups & Businesses – Computers For Classrooms
Design & Implementation Roles: Representatives on our Tech Plan team offered assistance with the implementation of our tech plan objectives focused on improving technology equity, access, after school opportunities, and home-school-community communications.
Higher Education – California State University Chico, Director of Academic Technologies and Instructional Media Center
Design & Implementation Roles: Representatives on our Tech Plan team reviewed a draft of our tech plan and offered input on research-based best practices in the adoption and integration of technology by teachers and students.
The Biggs Unified School District continues to solicit and expand our partnerships with stakeholders to enhance the infusion of educational technology into the curriculum. Our district recognizes that schools alone do not have the resources or expertise to keep pace with rapidly changing technology. We believe that these partnerships will help us serve the growing needs of an increasingly technical and global education system and society.
3: Curriculum Driven Technology Goals
Overview
This section addresses each of our six strategic curriculum driven technology goals and the development of each of our remaining technology plan components. State, district and site research-based curriculum planning documents and survey data, state and local student achievement results, and EdTech Profile survey data have served to guide our technology team in determining which research-based best practices to include in our 2006-2011 curriculum driven technology goals.
The following goals will strategically meet our students’ need to acquire and refine their technology and information literacy skills in order to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and ideally the enjoyment of their learning experiences as they master the core content standards.
Goal 1: District schools will use technology to support the district curricular goal of ALL students attaining proficiency or better with ELA content standards by the 2013-14 school year.
Goal 2: District schools will use technology to support the district curricular goal of ALL students attaining proficiency or better with Math content standards by the 2013-14 school year.
Goal 3: All Students will acquire the National Education Technology grade level profile standards for students (NETS) to support achievement of the academic standards in the classroom, district curricular goals, and ultimately for lifelong learning and success in our digital society.
Goal 4: All students will have equal access to technology to support achievement of the academic standards in the classroom, district curricular goals, and ultimately for lifelong learning and success in our digital society.
Goal 5: The district will support district and site use of technology to improve student achievement data collection, analysis, reporting, and decision-making.
Goal 6: The district and schools will use technology to improve two-way communication between home and school.
The following describes the technology access available in classrooms, library/media centers, or labs for all students, including special education, GATE, English Language Learners, both during and after school hours. Access to appropriate site-based technology resources has been evaluated through district inventory records, annual California School Tech Survey data. The 2004-05 data has been summarized below.
According to our current California Technology Survey and district records, our student to computer ratio for computers four years old or newer is 6.3:1 overall (124 computers for our 787 students k – 12). Additionally it should be noted that there are 106 computers presently that are older than four years, so it is obvious that our technology is aging. Without additional financial resources and commitments, that ratio will increase dramatically to 8:1 within one to two years due to the aging of the current computers. All teachers at all 7 BUSD K-12 schools in our district have access to a minimum of one multi-media computer with Internet access in their classrooms as well as in their Library/Media Centers, and/ or Computer Labs, before, during, and after school hours (however, many of these are aging computers). All teachers will schedule before and/ or after school access to computer programs and the Internet as needed for students to complete classroom activities. In addition, all students participating in the Kids.com after-school program at the Biggs Middle School, Biggs High School, and each of the elementary sites have computer and Internet access for 90 minutes after school on a daily basis. Additionally, all sites provide before-school and after-school access to students on an as-needed basis as teachers and librarians arrive early before school and stay later for an hour after school, providing help to individual students.
Elementary Schools
|
Biggs Elementary School: |
|
|
All Students, including Special Ed, ELL, and GATE students, have equal access to technology in the following areas: |
|
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer (*instructional use) |
49 |
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer with Internet access |
49 |
|
# of computers* in Classrooms |
16 |
|
# of computers* in Library/media centers |
2 |
|
# of computers* in Computer Labs |
31 |
|
# Available times for Student access to computers before and after school |
7:45 – 8:20 am / 2:45 – 5 pm |
|
Richvale Elementary School: |
|
|
All Students, including Special Ed, ELL, and GATE students, have equal access to technology in the following areas: |
|
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer (*instructional use) |
10 |
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer with Internet access |
10 |
|
# of computers* in Classrooms |
3 |
|
# of computers* in Library/media centers |
0 |
|
# of computers* in Computer Labs |
7 |
|
# Available times for Student access to computers before and after school |
7:45 – 8:20 am / 2:45 – 5 pm |
Middle School:
|
Biggs Middle School: |
|
|
All Students, including Special Ed, ELL, and GATE students, have equal access to technology in the following areas: |
|
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer (*instructional use) |
1 |
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer with Internet access |
1 |
|
# of computers* in Classrooms |
0 |
|
# of computers* in Library/media centers |
0 |
|
# of computers* in Computer Labs |
1 |
|
# Available times for Student access to computers before and after school |
7:45 – 8:20 am / 2:45 – 5 pm |
High School:
|
Biggs High School: |
|
|
All Students, including Special Ed, ELL, and GATE students, have equal access to technology in the following areas: |
|
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer (*instructional use) |
64 |
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer with Internet access |
64 |
|
# of computers* in Classrooms |
20 |
|
# of computers* in Library/media centers |
13 |
|
# of computers* in Computer Labs |
31 |
|
# Available times for Student access to computers before and after school |
7:45 – 8:20 am / 2:45 – 5 pm |
Alternative Ed:
|
Community Day School - Intermediate |
|
|
All Students, including Special Ed, ELL, and GATE students, have equal access to technology in the following areas: |
|
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer (*instructional use) |
0 |
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer with Internet access |
0 |
|
# of computers* in Classrooms |
0 |
|
# of computers* in Library/media centers |
0 |
|
# of computers* in Computer Labs |
0 |
|
# Available times for Student access to computers before and after school |
7:45 – 8:20 am / 2:45 – 5 pm |
|
Community Day School - Secondary |
|
|
All Students, including Special Ed, ELL, and GATE students, have equal access to technology in the following areas: |
|
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer (*instructional use) |
0 |
|
Total # of computers* 4 years old or newer with Internet access |
0 |
|
# of computers* in Classrooms |
0 |
|
# of computers* in Library/media centers |
0 |
|
# of computers* in Computer Labs |
0 |
|
# Available times for Student access to computers before and after school |
7:45 – 8:20 am / 2:45 – 5 pm |
3b. Current Technology Integration in Curriculum
The following data offers a snapshot of hardware /software use and typical frequency and technology / information literacy skills integrated in the curriculum in our district from the 2004-05 EdTech Profile certificated staff survey data. Complete BUSD data is available in our district EdTech Profile reports.
BUSD District Technology Integration
Technology is being integrated primarily in the classroom in core curriculum for word processing, reinforcement and practice, Online and CD-ROM research, and creating reports or projects. (See details in charts below)
BUSD District School Software Used:
Renaissance Place, Accelerated Reader, Reading Counts and SRI, Star Math and Accelerated Math, Math Blaster, Microsoft Office Suite, Internet resources, Adobe Reader, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Premiere, Adobe After Effects, Adobe Encore, Aeries Student Information Systems, Aeries ABI Browser Interface (for teachers and communications), Edusoft integrated online assessment program, a variety of grading programs, and CLRN approved curriculum based software.
|
How often do teachers use the following technology tools for classroom instruction? (in %) |
Daily |
2-4 days a week |
Between once a week and monthly |
Less than monthly |
Available, but I never use it |
Not available |
|
Computers and Peripherals (scanner, printers, etc.) |
45 |
16 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
5 |
|
Video based presentation devices (VCR/DVD, laser disc player, LCD projector, etc.) |
11 |
8 |
22 |
19 |
32 |
8 |
|
Video based creation tools (video camera, digital camera, etc.) |
3 |
3 |
11 |
18 |
39 |
26 |
|
Internet |
24 |
26 |
8 |
21 |
16 |
5 |
|
|
35 |
3 |
14 |
8 |
27 |
14 |
|
Hand-held electronic devices (PDA, GPS, heart monitor, etc.) |
5 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
11 |
81 |
|
How often and in what subject areas teachers use technology tools for instruction. (in %) |
Daily |
2-4 days a week |
Between once a week and monthly |
Less than monthly |
Never |
Not applicable |
|
Reading/Language Arts |
8 |
24 |
19 |
5 |
19 |
24 |
|
Mathematics |
8 |
5 |
24 |
5 |
30 |
27 |
|
Science |
3 |
3 |
24 |
21 |
21 |
29 |
|
History/Social Science |
8 |
3 |
14 |
16 |
24 |
35 |
|
PE/Health |
3 |
0 |
11 |
16 |
37 |
34 |
|
Fine Arts |
3 |
3 |
16 |
11 |
32 |
35 |
|
Business/Computer Science |
3 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
24 |
62 |
|
Foreign Language |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
27 |
70 |
|
Home Economics |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
27 |
65 |
|
Industrial Arts |
3 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
24 |
66 |
|
Careers |
3 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
22 |
59 |
|
In what ways and to what degree teachers use technology tools (computers, video, Internet, and hand-held devices) at their school. (in %) |
Daily |
2-4 days a week |
Between once a week and monthly |
Less than monthly |
Never |
|
Create instructional materials |
19 |
22 |
32 |
16 |
11 |
|
Deliver classroom instruction |
8 |
11 |
24 |
32 |
24 |
|
Manage student grades and attendance |
65 |
11 |
5 |
3 |
16 |
|
Communicate with parents or students |
22 |
22 |
30 |
8 |
19 |
|
Gather information for planning lessons |
5 |
30 |
41 |
16 |
8 |
|
Access model lesson plans and best practices |
5 |
8 |
35 |
35 |
16 |
|
To what degree do teachers use the following technology tools at your school to support and improve home/school communication? (in %) |
Daily |
2-4 days a week |
Between once a week and monthly |
Less than monthly |
Never |
|
Voice Mail |
32 |
21 |
18 |
8 |
21 |
|
School web site with class related information, such as assignments, grades, upcoming events, parental information, etc. |
19 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
68 |
|
Video Conferencing |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
95 |
|
Electronic Grading System |
27 |
5 |
8 |
3 |
57 |
|
Online Student Assessments |
8 |
0 |
14 |
14 |
65 |
|
Teachers have their students use technology tools (computers, video, Internet, and hand-held devices) for classroom assignments in the following locations. (in %) |
Library media center |
Computer Lab |
Classroom or other instructional areas |
Total Responses |
|
My students use technology tools in |
27 |
46 |
27 |
100% (74/74) |
|
How often teachers require students to use technology tools for classroom assignments. (in %) |
Daily |
2-4 days a week |
Between once a week and monthly |
Less than monthly |
Available but I never use it |
No Access |
|
Computers and peripherals (scanner, printer, etc.) |
11 |
14 |
22 |
17 |
33 |
3 |
|
Internet |
11 |
8 |
22 |
22 |
31 |
6 |
|
|
11 |
3 |
8 |
17 |
42 |
19 |
|
Hand-held electronic devices (EX: PDA, GPS, heart monitor, etc.) |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
83 |
|
How often teachers assign students in their typical classroom, work that involves using technology tools. |
Daily |
2-4 days a week |
Between once a week and monthly |
Less than monthly |
Never |
|
Word processing |
8 |
11 |
24 |
14 |
43 |
|
Reinforcement and practice |
3 |
11 |
30 |
22 |
35 |
|
Research, using the Internet and/or CD-ROMs |
3 |
11 |
27 |
19 |
41 |
|
Creating reports or projects |
0 |
11 |
24 |
24 |
41 |
|
How often teachers assign students in their typical classroom, work that involves using technology tools. |
Daily |
2-4 days a week |
Between once a week and monthly |
Less than monthly |
Never |
|
Demonstrations or simulations |
0 |
3 |
14 |
24 |
59 |
|
Correspondence with experts, authors, students from other schools, etc., via email or Internet |
0 |
0 |
11 |
14 |
76 |
|
Solving problems or analyzing data |
3 |
0 |
17 |
19 |
61 |
|
Graphically presenting information |
3 |
3 |
11 |
22 |
61 |
3c. Summary of District’s Curricular Planning Documents
Summary of the district’s curricular goals and academic content standards as spelled out in various district and site comprehensive planning documents.
The Biggs Unified School District has established clear curricular goals tied to the academic content standards monitored by various district and site-based assessment systems, and referenced in comprehensive planning documents and efforts. The common underlying purpose of all our district improvement plans is to improve student achievement of the state content standards.
Our 2004-05 state student achievement data indicates that our rigorous academic goals and objectives, aligned to both the content and cognition levels identified in the California Adopted Academic Content Standards and Frameworks, are beginning to have a positive impact at our schools. Our curricular focus is helping all students reach proficiency with the content standards and extra support for our significant subgroups of students who are not yet proficient. (See Student Achievement data that follows.)
Progress on the Academic Performance Index (API) 2004-05 Reporting Cycle
County: Butte
Data Resource:
http://ayp.cde.ca.gov/reports/page2.asp?subject=AYP&level=District&submit1=Submit
2005 AYP Criteria Summary
District: Biggs Unified
County: Butte
Our district met most of the 2005 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Criteria: 19 of its 22 AYP Criteria
Data Resource:
http://ayp.cde.ca.gov/reports/page2.asp?subject=AYP&level=District&submit1=Submit---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
English-
Met 2005 AYP criteria Language Arts Mathematics
Participation rate Yes Yes
Percent proficient No No
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
API - Additional Indicator for AYP Yes
Graduation rate Yes
|
English - Language Arts Target = 23.0 |
Mathematics Target = 23.7 |
|||
|
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) 2004-05 District PERCENT PROFICIENT |
Percent At or Above Proficient |
Met 2005 AYP Criteria |
Percent At or Above Proficient |
Met 2005 AYP Criteria |
|
LEA-wide |
32.6 |
Yes |
28.4 |
Yes |
|
African American or Black (not of Hispanic origin) |
||||
|
American Indian or Alaska Native |
||||
|
Asian |
||||
|
Filipino |
||||
|
Hispanic or Latino |
14 |
No |
21.3 |
No |
|
Pacific Islander |
||||
|
White (not of Hispanic origin) |
40.7 |
Yes |
31.2 |
Yes |
|
Socio-economically Disadvantaged |
23.1 |
Yes |
26.4 |
Yes |
|
English Learners |
7.2 |
No |
13.5 |
No |
|
Students with Disabilities |
8.5 |
No |
8.5 |
No |
Biggs Unified School District Curricular Goals
The district goals and corresponding specific measurable objectives that support them can be found in the following documents.
The most recent Biggs Elementary School Accountability Report Card states "the public interest is best served through assuring high quality education for all students; and, that knowledgeable, well-trained, and effective educators are essential to achieve excellence in education. The staff is dedicated to providing a high quality program through a combination of effective and innovative teaching methods. With the discontinuation of the state-funded SIP days, Biggs Elementary has faced the difficult task of meeting new state mandates, which require mastery of the California State Standards with limited time allotted for collaboration, or staff in-servicing and training. To alleviate this problem, goals and objectives need to be prioritized and attacked systemically. Butte County Office of Education has formed a partnership with our district, offering local staff development in a various areas of education."
The Biggs Elementary School mission statement states "Biggs Elementary School, staff, and community are committed to creating a safe, positive environment where academic excellence is promoted and individual growth is celebrated. All students will become lifelong learners who will value education and accept their social and global responsibilities."
Concerning Biggs Middle School and Biggs High School, board policy states that "the Governing Board recognizes that a well-articulated sequence of courses fosters academic progress and makes the best possible use of instructional time. The Board shall adopt a course of instruction, which sufficiently prepares students for the high school course of study required by state law. The Superintendent or designee shall keep the Board informed of any changes in the middle school and high school curriculum and shall solicit ways for expanding or improving our students' preparation for high school."
The Biggs High Expected School-Wide Learning Results states that "upon graduation from Biggs High School, every student will be an effective communicator who is an active listener and is able to read, understand & evaluate information and who responds appropriately either verbally or in written form. The student will be a lifelong learner who accepts and adapts to change, takes responsibility for his own success or failure, seeks information, asks questions effectively, and takes risks in exploring new ideas. The student will be a co-operative, collaborative learner and worker, who demonstrates the ability to work individually or collaboratively and who monitors her own behavior in groups and can assess or manage the group. The student will also demonstrate interactive communication who shows consideration for individual differences and who establishes and accomplishes individual and group goals. The student will also be a quality producer who creates intellectual, artistic, practical or physical products, who is able to use appropriate resources (human or intellectual), who, and works independently or collaboratively to complete tasks and accomplish goals in a timely manner. The student will be a productive member of society who is an active member of the school & community, who demonstrates positive and productive citizenship, who acknowledges and respects diversity and who accepts personal responsibility. The student will be a complex thinker who solves problems independently and as part of a team, who gathers, interprets, evaluates, and applies information to real-life situations, who uses logical and effective decision-making processes, and who applies basic academic skills in problem-solving situations."
The stated mission of Biggs High School is "to make all learners academically and vocationally prepared, self-reliant, curious, creative, thoughtful of others, technologically competent, and capable of using their learning to succeed in life and positively contribute to the community."
The Richvale School Accountability Report Card states: "Students need to work in an environment of excellence. Within such an atmosphere students are challenged through high expectations to set realistic goals, and to work toward mastering many levels of achievement. The Richvale Elementary staff recognizes that students need to develop respect for other students, teachers, staff, property, and the educational process. We have high expectations for student behavior, and encourage kindness and care. We also hold strong to family commitments."
All the school sites at BUSD share the mission statement for the school district:
"Biggs Unified School District’s mission is to prepare each student for the future, be it vocational or higher education. Students will leave Biggs Unified School District with respect for the world they inhabit and for all humanity."
Other district and site comprehensive planning documents and data that establish and/ or guide our standards-based curriculum include:
The site-level adopted State Content Standards for K-12.
The district LEA plan.
No Child Left Behind compliance / implementation documentation.
CDE and Federal district-wide school achievement data from annual AYP, API, and STAR results.
The CDE’s Academic Performance Survey (APS) and District Assessment Survey (DAS)
The District’s Master Plan for English Language Learners (ELL) describes the policies for identifying, assessing, and reporting students who have a primary language other than English. This ELL Master Plan provides details on the reclassification procedure and the English Language Development and instructional programs to be provided for ELL students to assist them in meeting and/or exceeding district content standards and graduation requirements.
The District’s Gifted and Talented (GATE) Plan provides challenging curriculum and instruction to gifted and talented students capable of achieving significantly beyond the level of their peers. The GATE plan supports the provision of services that are integrated into the regular school day as differentiated learning experiences that are based on the core curriculum.
The Policy and Procedures handbook which details the District’s philosophy and goals, and policy and procedures regarding students, instruction, promotion and retention, equity, administration, personnel, community relations, business, and much more.
Site–based Single Plans for Student Achievement, SARC, WASC and CPM self study reviews and actions plans. School Improvement Program (SIP), categorical programs, and other program goals, which vary from site to site.
Our current district Educational Technology Plan.
3d- 3h. Curricular Driven Technology Goals and Implementation Plans
3i -3j. Benchmarks, Timelines, Monitoring, and Evaluation
All of the Curriculum Component Criteria 3d-3j elements are included in the curricular driven action plan charts in the Component 3 pages that follow. Our curricular driven technology plans include clear, specific, realistic goals and measurable objectives that will support our district’s curriculum goals and student achievement of the state approved content standards.
Here is a summary of our curricular driven Ed Tech goals. The details can be found in the charts that follow.
3d. To Improve Teaching and Learning
Goal 1: Our schools will use technology to support the district curricular goal of ALL students attaining proficiency or better with ELA content standards by the 2013-14 school year.
Goal 2: Our schools will use technology to support the district curricular goal of ALL students attaining proficiency or better with Math content standards by the 2013-14 school year.
3e. For Student Acquisition of Technology and Information Literacy Skills.
Goal 3: All district students will acquire the National Education Technology grade level standards for students (NETS) to support achievement of the academic standards in the classroom, district curricular goals, and ultimately for lifelong learning and success in our digital society.
3f. For Appropriate Access to Technology for All Students
Goal 4: All district students will have equal access to technology to support achievement of the academic standards in the classroom, district curricular goals, and ultimately for lifelong learning and success in our digital society.
3g. To Make Student Record Keeping & Assessment More Efficient and Useful
Goal 5: Our district will support district and site use of technology to improve student achievement data collection, analysis, reporting, and research/ data driven decision-making.
3h. To Make Teachers and Administrators More Accessible to Parents.
Goal 6: Our district and schools will use technology to improve two-way communication between home and school.
District Technology Action Plan July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2011 (sections 3d, 3i-j)
|
Goal 1 - District Curriculum Goal Supported by Technology - E/LA & Technology |
|
Goal 1: Our schools will use technology to support the goal of ALL students attaining proficiency or better with ELA content standards by the 2013-14 school year. Target Group: All students including special education, English Learner, and GATE students. |
|
Specific Measurable Objective by June 30, 2011 |
|
Objective: 1a: By the 2010-11 school year, a minimum of 70% of all students will score proficient or above on the English-Language Arts portions of the STAR/CST test supported by state and district approved instructional resources, technology-based supplemental resources, professional development, student achievement data analysis, and collaboration time. Annual Benchmarks - Year 1: minimum of 35% in the 2006-07 school year Year 3: minimum of 55% in the 2008-09 school year Year 2: minimum of 45% in the 2007-08school year Year 4: minimum of 65% in the 2009 -2010 school year Year 5: minimum of 70% in the 2010-2011school year. |
|
Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data |
|
Instruments : Quarterly Grade level assessments; Annual STAR/CST test results in English/Language Arts; CAHSEEData: Percentage scoring proficient or above Instrument: Grade/subject level district professional development and collaboration meeting times / agendas / participation records and outcomes.Data: % of teachers participating: Calibrated and articulated standards-aligned Grade/subject level objectives and assessments across the district and standardized list of District supported research based programs and practices. Instrument: Ongoing Classroom Observations by site admin./ principal aligned to teachers’ evaluation scheduleData: Teachers’ use of standards-aligned learning objectives, instructional and intervention time, research based programs, practices and arrangements. Instrument : Annual Site Academic Software Survey:Data: Curriculum-based state and district approved software and productivity software being used at each site. Instrument : Annual EdTech Profile:Data: teacher’s self assessed technology and integration skills Data reviewers District curriculum, data, and technology administrators and school admins. will analyze annually in late August / September after state releases data. |
(Objective 1a - Continued on next page)
|
Goal 1: Objective: 1a - E/LA & Technology Implementation Action Steps |
Use of Technology |
1. Annually, purchase and ensure state adopted instructional materials (k-8 ), standards-aligned textbooks (9-12) and supplemental curriculum-based technology resources (adopted and/ or CLRN approved) are being used in the classroom. |
|
2. Annually, provide professional development on adopted curriculum and technology resources (such as AB 466 E/LA for teachers, AB 75 training for site admins.) |
|
3. Beginning in fall 2006 and every year thereafter, provide systematic professional development and collaboration time for site administration and teachers to align standards-based instruction and quarterly assessments horizontally and vertically through grade levels in the district, review data, learn and share best practices including the use of technology. |
|
4. By fall 2007, design and distribute an annual site academic software usage survey. |
|
5. By fall 2007, create and distribute a matrix of CLRN approved E/LA curriculum and intervention software that is supported by the district. |
|
6. Beginning in the fall 2007 and annually thereafter, provide professional development on district/ CLRN approved curriculum software and online resources as needed. Track usage with annual software survey. |
|
7. Continue to leverage funding to increase access to technology resources, hardware, and peripherals for students and teachers. |
|
8. Continue to provide CTAP Online Technology productivity and integration training as needed. |
|
9. Continue to monitor instructional time for adopted program (k-8) and standards-aligned text (9-12). |
|
10. Continue to monitor targeted intervention time aligned with adopted program (k-8) and standards-aligned text (9-12). Targeting the lowest performing students. |
|
11. By June 2006, fully credentialed Highly Qualified Teachers in all classrooms. |
|
12. Ongoing district support and professional development opportunities on the integration of E/LA skills and standards across the curriculum including in career tech courses. |
|
|
Monitoring |
|
|
District curriculum, data, and technology administrators and school site administrators track the development and implementation of all activities and accomplishments monthly and report progress at our monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to insure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective. |
|
|
Timeline: Most of the aforementioned actions are already underway annually in the district at all grade levels and will continue to be planned for and implemented after annual data driven needs assessments and data analyses take place for each school, annually no later than October 1. |
|
|
Person(s) responsible : District admins. and school site admins, the District Technology Director, and teachers are responsible for the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of all the aforementioned activities. Teachers are responsible for completing all necessary professional development and ensuring their instruction is based on standards-aligned objectives and research based programs, practices and arrangements. |
|
District Technology Action Plan July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2011 (sections 3d, 3i-j)
|
Goal 2- District Curriculum Goal Supported by Technology – Math & Technology |
|
Goal 2: Our schools will use technology to support the goal of ALL students attaining proficiency or better with Math content standards by the 2013-14 school year. Target Group: All students including special education, English Learner, and GATE students. |
|
Specific Measurable Objective by June 30, 2011 |
|
Objective: 2a: By the 2010-11 school year, a minimum of 70% of all students will score proficient or above on the Math portions of the STAR: CST test supported by state and district approved instructional resources, technology-based supplemental resources, professional development, student achievement data analysis, and collaboration time. Annual Benchmarks - Year 1: minimum of 35% in the 2006-07 school year Year 3: minimum of 55% in the 2008-09 school year Year 2: minimum of 45% in the 2007-08school year Year 4: minimum of 65% in the 2009 -2010 school year Year 5: minimum of 70% in the 2010-2011school year. |
|
Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data |
|
Instruments : Quarterly Grade level assessments; Annual STAR/CST test results in Math; CAHSEEData: Percentage scoring proficient or above with the content standards. Instrument: Ongoing Classroom Observations by site admin./ principal aligned to teachers’ evaluation scheduleData: Teachers’ use of standards-aligned learning objectives, instructional and intervention time, research based programs, practices and arrangements. Instrument : Annual Site Academic Software Survey:Data: Curriculum-based state and district approved software and productivity software being used. Instrument : Annual EdTech Profile:Data: teachers’ self assessed technology and integration skills Data reviewers District curriculum, data, and technology administrators and school admins. will analyze annually in late August / September after state releases data. |
(Objective 2a- Continued on next page)
|
Goal 2: Objective: 2a - Math & Technology Implementation Action Steps |
Use of Technology |
1. Annually, purchase and ensure state adopted instructional materials (k-8), standards-aligned textbooks (9-12) and supplemental curriculum-based technology resources (adopted and/ or CLRN approved) are being used in the classroom. |
|
2. Annually, provide professional development on adopted curriculum and technology resources (such as AB 466 Math for teachers, AB 75 training for site admins.) |
|
3. Annually, provide systematic professional development and collaboration time for site administration and teachers to align standards-based instruction and quarterly assessments horizontally and vertically through grade levels in the district, review data, learn and share best practices including the use of technology. |
|
4. By fall 2007, design and distribute an annual site academic software usage survey. |
|
5. By fall 2007, create and distribute a matrix of CLRN approved Math curriculum and intervention software and online resources that is supported by the district. Track usage with annual survey. |
|
6. Annually provide professional development on district/ CLRN approved curriculum software and online resources as needed. |
|
7. Continue to leverage funding to increase access to technology resources, hardware, and peripherals for students and teachers. |
|
8. Continue to provide CTAP Online Technology productivity and integration training as needed. |
|
9. Continue to monitor instructional time for adopted program (k-8) and standards-aligned text (9-12). |
|
10. Continue to monitor targeted intervention time aligned with adopted program (k-8) and standards-aligned text (9-12), targeting the lowest performing students. |
|
11. By June 2006, fully credentialed Highly Qualified Teachers in all classrooms. |
|
|
Monitoring |
|
|
District curriculum, data, and technology administrators and school site administrators track the development and implementation of all activities and accomplishments monthly and report progress at our monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to insure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective. |
|
|
Timeline: The aforementioned actions are already underway annually in the district and will continue to be planned for and implemented after annual data driven needs assessments take place for each school annually no later than October 1. |
|
|
Person(s) responsible : District and site admins, the District Technology Director, and teachers are responsible for the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of all the aforementioned activities. Teachers are responsible for completing all necessary professional development and ensuring their instruction is based on standards-aligned objectives and research based programs, practices and arrangements. |
|
District Technology Action Plan July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2011 (sections 3e, 3i-j)
|
Goal 3 - District Technology Skills and Information Literacy Goal |
|
Goal 3: All students in our district will acquire the National Education Technology grade level student profile standards (NETS) to support achievement of the academic standards in the classroom, district curricular goals, and ultimately for lifelong learning and success in our digital society. Target Group: All students including special education, English Learner, and GATE students. |
|
Specific Measurable Objective by June 30, 2011 |
|
Objective: 3a - All students will pass the NETS based grade band technology assessments by 2010-2011 school year. Teachers will learn to integrate the student NETS skills in their academic curriculum assignments. Students will learn the NETS skills (including technology productivity tools and information literacy) as appropriate, during their curricular assignments. Student proficiency will be tracked through end of year NETS exit assessments/ portfolios (k-2, 3-5, 6-8, ) and the high school graduation computer competency assessment (for 9-12). The Six NETS Strands have scaffolded grade level (PreK – 2, 3 – 5, 6 – 8, 9 – 12) specific standards and performance indicators.
Annual Benchmarks - Year 1: 0% in the 2006-07 school year – NETs rollout planning and development Year 3: minimum of 60% in the 2008-09 school year Year 2: minimum of 40% in the 2007-08school year Year 4: minimum of 80% in the 2009-2010school yearYear 5: 100% in the 2010-11 school year. |
|
Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data |
|
Instrument Annual Standardized District NETS based Grade level Exit assessment/ survey based on student profile NETS standards which include technology skills and information literacy, Annual High school graduation computer competency assessment:Data: Percentage passing assessment Instrument: Annual EdTech ProfileData: teachers’ self assessed technology and integration skills Data reviewers District Technology Director, school site admins., and school site tech coordinators will analyze end of school year results annually in June. |
(Objective 3a- Continued on next page)
|
Goal 3: Objective: 3a - Technology Skills & Information Literacy |
Use of Technology |
1. During the 2006-07 school year, a focus group of teachers, librarians and media assistants, in the district help design the grade band student NETS curriculum integration and assessments for k-12 technology and information literacy skills. |
|
2. By spring 2007, adopt grade level NETS based standards for k-12 student technology skills and information literacy. |
|
3. Beginning in the summer/fall 2007 and annually thereafter, provide Professional Development opportunities (from the District, CTAP Online, and CTAP Region 2) to K-12 teachers on integrating the student NETS grade level skills and standards in their curriculum. Provide incentives for PD completion. |
|
4. By fall 2007, Students will begin systematically learning the NETS skills including technology productivity tools and information literacy, as appropriate, during curricular assignments. |
|
5. By spring 2008, begin administering annually the standards-aligned grade span NETS based exit assessments / portfolios for grades 2 & 5 |
|
6. By spring 2009, begin administering annually the standards-aligned grade span NETS based exit assessments / portfolios for grade 8. |
|
7. By spring 2009, align, and revise High School Computer Competency exit exam with NETS based standards for grades 9-12 and begin administering annually. |
|
|
Monitoring |
|
|
The District Technology Director, school site administrators and site technology coordinators will track the development and implementation of all NETS activities and accomplishments monthly and report progress at our monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to insure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective. |
|
|
Timeline: The timeline for the aforementioned actions are included in the Action Steps listed above. |
|
|
Person(s) responsible : District and site admins, the District Technology Director, and teachers are responsible for the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of all the aforementioned activities. Teachers are responsible for completing the training, integrating the NETs skills, and assessing the students. |
|
District Technology Action Plan July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2011 (sections 3f, 3i-j)
|
Goal 4 - District Goal for Appropriate Access to Technology |
|
Goal 4: All students in our district will have equal access to technology to support achievement of the academic standards in the classroom, district curricular goals, and ultimately for lifelong learning and success in our digital society. Target Group: All students including special education, English Learner, and GATE students. |
|
Specific Measurable Objective by June 30, 2011 |
|
Objective: 4a – By June 30, 2011 our district average student to computer ratio will be 4 to 1 or better. (CDE defined up-to-date multimedia computer as four years old or newer as per annual California School Technology data and district records). Annual Benchmarks - Year 1: 8 students to 1 computer by June 2007. Year 3: 6 students to 1 computer by June 2009.Year 2: 7 students to 1 computer by June 2008 Year 4: 5 students to 1 computer by June 2010 Year 5: Maintain or improve 4 students to 1 computer by June 2011All students will have equal access to technology to support achievement of the academic standards in the classroom, district curricular goals, and ultimately for success in the workplace including special education, English Learner, and GATE students. The technology goals and objectives for these student sub groups are the same as for all other students (see Goal 3) although the programs and methods for achieving the objective may be adapted to best meet their needs. Students with an active Individualized Education Program will have appropriate access to technology hardware, peripherals, and software including assistive technology as deemed appropriate and defined by the IEP site team and the students’ IEP goals. English Learners will have appropriate access to technology hardware, peripherals, and software needed to support their English language acquisition as well as their achievement of the academic standards. Students identified as Gifted and Talented (GATE) will have appropriate access to technology hardware, peripherals, and software needed to support their advanced curriculum. |
|
Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data |
|
Instrument: Annual California School technology SurveyData: average student to computer ratio by school and district wide – Four years old or newer Instrument: Annual District Supplemental Tech needs and service survey including IEP, EL, and GATE program directors and educators in the district:Data: Technology Accessibility to all students including special technology needs (IEP, EL, and GATE) and feedback on new district communication and collaboration strategies. Data reviewers District Technology Director, school site admins. and school site tech coordinators will analyze end of school year results annually in June. |
(Objective 4a- Continued on next page)
|
Goal 4: Objective: 4a - Appropriate Access to Technology Implementation Action Steps |
Use of Technology |
1. Annually leverage technology funding and grants to provide new computers and Computers for Classrooms to provide like new refurbished computers to schools and teachers participating in district Ed Tech professional development and to district schools with the highest student to computer ratio (as space permits). |
|
2. Annually in the spring, systematic supplemental survey and review of school technology hardware and software accessibility and inventories including adaptive equipment, EL support software, and GATE technology resources from evaluation surveys. Data is used to develop a matrix of site technology obsolescence, purchase, installation priorities and schedules. |
|
3. Annually install new computers and remove outdated computers at sites on a rotating schedule during designated breaks in the school year. |
|
4. Beginning in the 2006-07school year, conduct ongoing research on creative space saving solutions for desktop computers, thin clients, and wireless laptop carts. Report all findings to site administration at monthly meetings. |
|
5. Beginning in the 2006-07school year, cultivate ongoing two-way communication between district Special Education program directors and educators, site administrators, and the district Tech Director (via e-mail/phone) and meet annually to determine appropriate technology access and assistive technology needs of IEP students. |
|
|
|
|
|
8. By fall 2007, all students enrolled in district after school programs will have access to Internet connected computers and curricular technology integration / homework support. |
|
|
Monitoring |
|
|
The District Technology Director, school site administrators, site technology coordinators will track the development and implementation of all appropriate access activities, inventories and accomplishments monthly and report progress at our monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to insure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective. |
|
|
Timeline: The timeline for the aforementioned actions begins during the first year of our five-year tech plan July 2007 –June 2007 and will continue annually. |
|
|
Person(s) responsible : District and site admins, the District Technology Director, district Special Ed, EL, and Gifted and Talented (GATE) program directors are responsible for the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of all the aforementioned Teachers are responsible for attending professional development. |
|
District Technology Action Plan July 1, 2006– June 30, 2011 (sections 3g, 3i-j)
|
Goal 5 - District Goal for Using Technology for Student Data Collection, Analysis, Reporting, and Decision Making |
|
Goal 5: Districts will support district and site use of technology to improve student achievement data collection, analysis, reporting, and decision-making. Target Group: All district schools. |
|
Specific Measurable Objectives by June 30, 2011 |
|
Objective 5a: By June 2011, 70% of district teachers will have implemented and integrated the Edusoft student assessment and data management system for the purpose of analyzing assessment data, making data-driven decisions to meet individual student academic needs and targeting student intervention needs. Annual Benchmarks Year 1: 30% of teachers in the district by June 2007. Year 3: 50% of teachers in the district by June 2009Year 2: 40% of teachers in the district by June 2008. Year 4: 60% of teachers in the district by June 2010. Year 5: 70% of teachers the district by June 2011. Objective: 5b: By June 2011, 100% of district teachers will have access to the District’s student information / attendance software / online suite tools (Aeries ABI) and necessary training to use. Annual Benchmarks Year 1: 80% of district teachers by June 2007. Year 3: 90% of district teachers by June 2009.Year 2: 85% of district teachers by June 2008. Year 4: 95% of district teachers by June 2010 Year 5: 100% of district teachers by June 2011. |
|
Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data |
|
Instrument: District integrated student assessment and data management system training participation records and usage recordsData: % of school sites and teachers using integrated student assessment and data management system to inform instruction. Instruments: District Aeries and ABI training participation records and Aeries/ABI web interface for parents usage recordsData: % of teachers completing Aeries/ABI parent connect training; % of teachers using Aeries/ABI for parent communication. Data reviewers District Technology Director, school site admins., and school site tech coordinators will analyze end of school year results annually in June. |
(Objective 5a,b,c- Continued on next page)
|
Goal 5: Objective: 5a,b Student Data Collection, Analysis, Reporting, and Decision Making Implementation Action Steps |
Use of Technology |
1. During the 2006-07 school year and every year thereafter until we meet our 2010-11 school year objective, the district will continue its rollout of an integrated student assessment platform at selected school sites. Participating teachers will get necessary training. |
|
2. Annually, provide systematic professional development and collaboration time for site administration and teachers to improve student achievement assessment, data collection, analysis, reporting, and data driven decision making, align standards-based instruction, learn and share best practices in instruction and intervention, including the use of technology using the Edusoft tools, and develop quarterly assessments horizontally and vertically through grade levels in the district. |
|
3. Aeries/ABI integration is already underway. All schools currently are using the student information system to report attendance. The other components for parent/student sharing of information over the Internet for parent use will continue to be rolled out at district sites, with priority given to schools with the hardware, infrastructure, and site administration support necessary to fully implement. |
|
|
Monitoring |
|
|
The District Technology Director, school site administrators and site technology coordinators will track the development and implementation of all activities and accomplishments monthly and report progress at monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to insure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective. |
|
|
Timeline: The timeline for the aforementioned actions are included in the Action Steps listed above. |
|
|
Person(s) responsible : District and site admins, and the District Technology Director are responsible for the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of all the aforementioned activities. Teachers are responsible for attending professional development and inputting student data. |
|
District Technology Action Plan July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2011 (sections 3h, 3i-j)
|
Goal 6 - District Goal for Improving Parent Access to Teachers and Administrators |
|
Goal 6: The district office and schools will use technology to improve two-way communication between home and school. Target Group: Parents of all students including special education, English Learner, and GATE students. |
|
Specific Measurable Objective by June 30, 2011 |
|
Objective: 6a By June 2011, all schools will offer parents password protected, online access to their student’s attendance, assignments and grades through a web-based system such as Aeries/ABI web interface for parents and students. Annual Benchmarks - Year 1: 80% of schools by June 2007. Year 3: 90% of schools by June 2009.Year 2: 85% of schools by June 2008. Year 4: 95% of schools by June 2010 Year 5: 100% of schools by June 2011 Objective: 6b By June 2011, all district site administrators and teachers will have access to a classroom phone, voice-mail, and a district e-mail account and will provide this information to all parents at back to school night and via the school website. Annual Benchmarks Year 1: 80% of schools by June 2007. Year 3: 90% of schools by June 2009.Year 2: 85% of schools by June 2008. Year 4: 95% of schools by June 2010 Year 5: 100% of schools by June 2011 Objective: 6c By June 2011, all district site administrators and teachers will provide parents with timely school / class information via newsletters, flyers (sent via regular mail and email, also posted on the Internet at the school web site) (translated in native home language as needed.) Annual Benchmarks Year 1: 80% of schools by June 2007. Year 3: 90% of schools by June 2009.Year 2: 85% of schools by June 2008. Year 4: 95% of schools by June 2010 Year 5: 100% of schools by June 2011 |
|
Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data |
|
Instruments: Ongoing Aeries/ABI "how to access’ communications and/ or trainings, parent password requests, and usage records.Data: % of parents trained; % of parents requesting passwords; % of parents using ABI Instrument: Monthly Site Admin reports to district on implementation status of standards-based progress report mailings.Data: % of district schools that have implemented standards-based progress report mailings. Instrument: District and site based equipment and e-mail account recordsData: % of teachers with access Instrument: School website and communication artifacts.Data: evidence of efforts to improve two-way communication Data reviewers District Technology Director, school site admins., and school site tech coordinators will analyze end of school year results annually in June. |
|
Goal 6: Objectives: 6a,b, c - Improving Parent Access to Teachers and Administrators Implementation Action Steps 5 |
Use of Technology |
1. By fall 2006, develop an installation / replacement schedule for teachers and admins. without phone, voice-mail, and/ or e-mail. Provide training as needed. |
|
2. By fall 2006, develop an Outlook Exchange district wide training program for all teacher and administrators |
|
3. By June 2007, design and distribute a standardized district Student at Risk notification template letter to schools. |
|
4. By June 2009, ensure all district schools have the hardware, infrastructure, and training needed to implement the Aeries/ABI |
|
5. By June 2011, all district schools will be providing access to Parent Connect and all district parents will have received information and/ or training about how to access Parent Connect student data. |
|
6. Continue to fund and maintain, district and school websites where news, announcement, staff contact information, teacher class information, events, etc. are communicated with students and parents. |
|
7. Annually, provide Front Page web publishing software training opportunities for teachers to learn to publish / communicate on their school web site. |
|
8. Annually provide Word and Desktop publishing training to teachers and classified staff to learn to publish professional / attention getting documents to improve communication between home, school, and community. |
|
|
Monitoring |
|
|
The District Technology Director, school site administrators and site technology coordinators will track the development and implementation of all activities and accomplishments monthly and report progress at our monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to insure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective. |
|
|
Timeline: The timeline for the aforementioned actions are included in the Action Steps listed above. |
|
|
Person(s) responsible : District and site admins, and the District Technology Director are responsible for the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of all the aforementioned activities. Teachers are responsible for attending professional development and inputting student data |
|
4a. Summary of District Teachers’ & Administrators’ Technology Skills
Summary of the teachers’ and administrators’ current technology skills and needs for professional development.
Our Education Technology Plan provides a clear summary of our district teachers’ and administrators’ current technology skills from the EdTech Profile survey. Our survey findings are summarized by discrete skills in order to better facilitate professional development planning that meets our identified needs and technology plan goals. Additional district technology integration data can be found in Component 3b of our Technology Plan.
Our district reviews EdTech Profile survey data and teacher input annually in the spring to plan for district sponsored professional development activities for the next school year. Schools use their site’s EdTech Profile survey data and teacher input annually to plan for site-based professional development needs.
Site Administrators’ Survey Data
EdTech Profile survey data of district school site administrator’s as of March 2006, indicates that most administrators are at the introductory levels with general computing, Internet, e-mail, word processing, presentation, spreadsheet, and database skills.
Implication: Administrators need professional development opportunities in basic Personal Technology proficiencies.
|
|
|
|
1 |
General computer knowledge and skills (Includes 2 in calculation) |
|
2 |
Internet skills (Includes 2 in calculation) |
|
3 |
Email skills (Includes 2 in calculation) |
|
4 |
Word processing skills (Includes 2 in calculation) |
|
5 |
Presentation software skills (Includes 2 in calculation) |
|
6 |
Spreadsheet software skills (Includes 2 in calculation) |
|
7 |
Database software skills (Includes 2 in calculation) |
District Teachers’ Survey Data
EdTech Profile survey data of district teachers as of March, 2006, indicates that most teachers are at intermediate levels with general computing, Internet, e-mail, and word processing and at the introductory level in presentation, spreadsheet, and database skills.
Implication: Teachers need professional development opportunities in basic Personal Technology proficiencies.
|
|
|
|
1 |
General computer knowledge and skills (Includes 41 in calculation) |
|
2 |
Internet skills (Includes 41 in calculation) |
|
3 |
Email skills (Includes 41 in calculation) |
|
4 |
Word processing skills (Includes 41 in calculation) |
|
5 |
Presentation software skills (Includes 41 in calculation) |
|
6 |
Spreadsheet software skills (Includes 41 in calculation) |
|
7 |
Database software skills (Includes 41 in calculation) |
In addition, the following district technology training preferences came from 2005
EdTech Profile survey data for the district and were factored into our professional development plans.
|
Teacher needs and preferences regarding the type or level of technology training at their school. |
Basic computer/ technology skills |
Integrating technology |
Neither |
|
I need opportunities to participate in educational technology staff development focused on: |
37% |
63% |
0% |
The implication: Although we will continue to offer both Basic Personal Proficiency and Professional proficiency technology integration training, we will offer more curriculum integration opportunities to meet the need.
|
Teacher needs and preferences regarding technology training format at their school. |
One-on-one informal technology training. |
Small group technology training. |
Online web-based technology training. |
|
The training format I prefer is: |
33% |
52% |
15% |
The implication: We will offer small group technology training primarily supported by online web-based resources and provide one on one technology coach site-based support, meeting all three identified needs.
|
Teacher needs and preferences regarding technology training availability at their school. |
During the school day. |
After school. |
In the evening. |
On the weekend. |
During the summer/off track. |
|
I prefer technology training to be offered: |
48% |
28% |
2% |
0% |
22% |
The implication: We will offer technology training at a variety of times, with most offerings during the day, as in small group in-services or on-line. Some professional development will occur during the school day with subs and during summer workshops and conferences.
4b-d. Professional Development Goals, Benchmarks, Timelines, Monitoring, and Evaluation.
All of the Professional Development Criteria 4b-d elements are included in the teachers’ and administrators’ professional development action plan charts in the Component 4 pages that follow. Our professional development action plans are based on a thorough needs analysis and include clear, specific, realistic goals, and measurable objectives that will provide our teachers and administrators with sustained, ongoing professional development necessary to implement the Curriculum Component of our Education Technology Plan.
Our three main Education Technology professional development goals over the next five years are:
Goal 1: All teachers in the district will become proficient with the same general technology skills, technology integration skills, and information literacy skills required of their students as well as proficient with work specific productivity tools.
Goal 2: All teachers in the district will become proficient in the use of technology to improve student achievement data collection, analysis, reporting, and decision-making.
Goal 3: District site administrators and teachers will become proficient in the use of technology to improve two-way communication between home and school.
The accomplishment of these goals will be met through the following:
Our Education Technology Professional development will encompass a three-tiered professional development approach based on teachers’ individual technology training needs.
1. Annually as needed, we will offer Personal proficiency training on NETs skills including general computer knowledge and skills, Internet skills, Email skills, Word processing skills, Presentation software skills, and Spreadsheet /Database software skills.
2. Annually as needed, we will offer Professional proficiency training on NETs skills integration including information literacy, curriculum-based software, adopted materials software resources, online resources such as SETs, and job specific productivity and assessment tools.
3. Annually as needed, we will offer Technology Leadership / Coach proficiency training: Training interested teachers as site-based coaches offering support to teachers as they work toward proficiency in tiers one and two.
Our coordinated professional development plan is based on the analysis of our teachers’ and administrators’ technology skills and needs as well as our district’s curricular goals. The district will offer a variety of training options such as the CTAP Online (www.ctaponline.org) learning portal, face-to-face training & collaboration time, and one-on-one coaching. We will maximize the use of technology and site resources to support the district’s goals and objectives for curriculum, instruction, intervention, and assessment, including but not limited to the following:
Site-based technology coaches and CTAP Online mentors available to each district site.
District as well as site based annual face-to-face technology skill professional development opportunities.
Anytime, anywhere online district technology professional development opportunities using CTAP Online Personal and Professional Proficiency technology classes and supported by site based technology coaches.
District content and grade-band specific technology integration face-to-face professional development supported with district professional development and resources online using CTAP Online’s CourseBuilder tool.
CTAP Online technology integration training.
Broad-based pre/post completions of the EdTech Profile survey and professional development data analysis to track improvements and training needs.
Annual professional development offerings / priorities based on student, teacher, and administrator EdTech Profile survey data and district curricular goals.
Student assessment and intervention, student information system, web publishing, e-mail, and voice-mail training opportunities for all stakeholders as needed to support student achievement and improve home / school communications and interventions.
Identification, training, and use of low and no cost Internet, video-conferencing and face-to-face learning opportunities and resources. National, State and local online research-based strategies and resources will be leveraged and integrated during faculty meetings, collaboration time, and professional development such as the U.S. Department of Education’s web site What Works Clearinghouse (http://www.w-w-c.org/). We will regularly examine and use relevant data from the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), which was established in 2002 by the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences to provide educators, policymakers, researchers, and the public with a central and trusted source of scientific evidence of what works in education. We will also rely on the County Office of Education, CTAP Region 2, and CTAP Online resources, and the Statewide Education Technology Services (SETS) which includes: California Learning Resource Network (CLRN)- which identifies CDE approved supplemental electronic learning resources that both meet local instructional needs and embody the implementation of California curriculum frameworks and standards; the Technology Information Center for Administrative Leadership (TICAL) - which helps administrators find technology resources to assist in the day-to-day needs of their jobs; and the Technical Support for Education Technology in Schools (TechSETS) - which provides technical professionals in California schools improved access to training, support and other resources.
All of the Professional Development Criteria 4b-d elements are included in the teachers’ and administrators’ professional development action plan charts in the Component 4 pages that follow.
District Professional Development Plan July 1, 2006– June 30, 2011 (sections 4b-4d)
Goal 1 - District Professional Development Goal
Goal 1: District Site Teachers will become proficient with the same general technology skills, technology integration skills, and information literacy skills required of students as well as proficient with work-specific productivity tools.
Target Group: Certificated teachers and administrators
Supports Curriculum Driven Technology Goals and Objectives 1,2, 3 & 4 in Component 3 of our Ed Tech Plan
Specific Measurable Objectives by June 30, 2011
Objective: 1a: By June 2011, 90% of the teachers, who participate in district-sponsored educational technology professional development, will be proficient with general technology knowledge and skills, classroom productivity tools, and information literacy skills aligned to the NETs for teachers and NETs for students. All district ELD, Special Education and GATE teachers will become proficient in technology skills and assistive tools for their subgroup populations.
Annual Benchmarks
Year 1: minimum of 50%
in the 2006-07 school year Year 3: minimum of 70% in the 2008-09 school yearYear 2: minimum of 60% in the 2007-08 school year Year 4: minimum of 80% in the 2009-10 school year
Year 5: minimum of 90% in the 2010-11 school year.
Objective: 1b: By June 2011, 90% of the ELA and Math teachers, who participate in educational technology professional development focused on technology integration including CLRN and/ or SBE approved curriculum based technology resources will become proficient.
Annual Benchmarks
Year 1: minimum of 50% in the 2006-07 school year Year 3: minimum of 70% in the 2008-09 school year
Year 2: minimum of 60% in the 2007-08 school year Year 4: minimum of 80% in the 2009-10 school year
Year 5: minimum of 90% in the 2010-11 school year.
Objective: 1c:. By June 2011, the district will provide a trained technology mentor / coach to all district schools.
Annual Benchmarks
Year 1: minimum of 2 schools
in the 2006-07 school year Year 3: minimum of 4 schools in the 2008-09 school yearYear 2: minimum of 3 schools in the 2007-08 school year Year 4: minimum of 5 schools in the 2009-10 school year
Year 5: minimum of 6 schools in the 2010-11 school year.
Objectives 1a,b,c,d - Continued on next page)
Goal 1: Objective: 1a, b, c, d Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data
Instrument
: CTAP2 pre and post EdTech Profile completed for all district sponsored Education Technology professional development programsData: Administrators’ and teachers’ self-assessed technology and integration skills
Instrument
: District and site-based training agendas and recordsData: Professional development participation correlated with proficiency in EdTech Profile survey
Data reviewers
District curriculum, data, and technology administrators and school admins. will analyze benchmark data annually in late August / September and make any necessary modifications in order to meet our objectives.
Goal 1: Objective: 1a, b, c, d - Implementation Action Steps
Use of Technology
1. Annually, require administrator and teacher completion of pre and post EdTech Profile survey by all who participate in district-sponsored technology training programs.
2. Annually, in June, analyze EdTech Profile administrator and teacher technology and integration skill data to plan for professional development offerings during the year.
3. Annually, provide EdTech Profile workshops to teachers, administrators, and site EdTech Profile admins.
4. Annually in the fall, schedule and promote district-sponsored technology workshops for administrators and for teachers during the school year aligned to the content standards, to the NETs, assistive technology, and to identified EdTech Profile professional development needs including information literacy skills.
5. Annually in the fall, schedule and promote district-sponsored technology integration and CLRN approved curriculum-based software and resource workshops for Math and ELA teachers by grade bands (K-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-12) during the school year aligned to the content standards, to the NETs, and to identified EdTech Profile professional development needs.
6. Annually, the district will train site-based technology integration mentors and CTAP Online mentors to support district technology participants at the site level.
7. Annually, provide systematic professional development and collaboration time for site administration and teachers to analyze student achievement data, align standards-based instruction, learn and share best practices in instruction and intervention, including the use of technology and develop quarterly assessments horizontally and vertically through grade levels in the district.
Monitoring
District curriculum, data, and technology administrators and school site administrators track the development and implementation of all activities and accomplishments monthly and report progress at our monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to ensure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective.
Timeline:
The timeline for the aforementioned actions are included in the Action Steps listed above.Person(s) responsible
: District admins., the District Technology Director, school site admins, and site media specialists / mentors are responsible for the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of all the aforementioned activities. Site administrators and teachers are responsible for completing all necessary professional development and ensuring student instruction is based on standards-aligned objectives and research-based programs, practices and arrangements.
Goal 2 - District Professional Development Goal
Goal 2: District site administrators and teachers will become proficient in the use of technology to improve student achievement data collection, analysis, reporting, and decision-making.
Target Group: Certificated teachers and administrators
Supports Curriculum Driven Technology Goals and Objectives 1,2,3,5, & 6 in Component 3 of our Ed Tech Plan
Specific Measurable Objectives by June 30, 2011
Objective 2a: By June 2011, 90% of district administrators and teachers, who attend professional development, will be proficient with the implementation and integration of the Edusoft student assessment and data management system.
Annual Benchmarks
Year 1: 50%
by June 2007. Year 3: 70% by June 2009.Year 2: 60%
by June 2008. Year 4: 80% by June 2010.Year 5:
90% by June 2011.Objective: 2b: By June 2011, 90% of district administrators and teachers, who attend professional development, will be proficient with the complete district student information / attendance suite: Aeries, ABI (and the Parent Component) offering parents password-protected, online access to their student’s attendance, assignments, grades, and progress reports.
Annual Benchmarks
Year 1: 50
% by June 2007. Year 3: 70% by June 2009.Year 2: 60%
by June 2008. Year 4: 80% by June 2010.Year 5:
90% by June 2011.Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data
Instrument
: Annual EdTech Profile:Data: teacher’s self assessed technology and integration skills
Instrument
: District sponsored training records, usage records and site-based mentor support recordsData: % of teachers trained and proficient.
Data reviewers
District curriculum, data, and technology administrators and school admins. will analyze benchmark data annually in late August / September and make any necessary modifications in order to meet our objectives.
(Objective 2a,b - Continued on next page)
Goal 2: Objective: 2a,b Implementation Action Steps
Use of Technology
1. Annually, require administrator and teacher completion pre and post EdTech Profile survey by all who participate in district-sponsored technology training programs.
2. Annually, in June, analyze EdTech Profile administrator and teacher survey results on data driven instructional decision-making and student data reporting systems to plan for professional development offerings.
3. Annually by September, plan professional development opportunities for the year focused on standards-aligned classroom assessments and data-driven decisions that meet individual student academic needs and target student intervention needs. Promote opportunities to teachers through all available communication conduits.
4. Annually in the fall, schedule and promote district-sponsored technology workshops for administrators and for teachers during the school year on all needed Aeries and ABI components.
5. Annually in the fall, schedule and promote district-sponsored technology workshops for administrators and for teachers during the school year on the district’s web-based student reporting system.
6. Annually in the fall, schedule and promote district sponsored technology workshops for administrators and for teachers during the school year on the Edusoft integrated student assessment platform/system.
7. Annually, provide systematic professional development and collaboration time for site administration and teachers to analyze student achievement data, align standards-based instruction, learn and share best practices in instruction and intervention, including the use of technology and develop quarterly assessments horizontally and vertically through grade levels in the district.
Monitoring
District curriculum, data, and technology administrators and school site administrators track the development and implementation of all activities and accomplishments monthly and report progress at our monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to ensure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective.
Timeline:
The timeline for the aforementioned actions are included in the Action Steps listed above.Person(s) responsible
: District admins., the District Technology Director, school site admins, and site media specialists / mentors are responsible for the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of all the aforementioned activities. Site administrators and teachers are responsible for completing all necessary professional development and ensuring student instruction is based on standards-aligned objectives and research based programs, practices and arrangements.
Goal 3 - District Professional Development Goal
Goal 3: District administrators and teachers will become proficient in the use of technology to improve two-way communication between home and school.
Target Group: Certificated teachers and administrators
Supports Curriculum Driven Technology Goals and Objectives 1,2,3,5,& 6 in Component 3 of our Ed Tech Plan
Specific Measurable Objectives by June 30, 2011
Objective: 3a By June 2011, 90% site administrators and teachers, who attend professional development, will be proficient with using Word and/ or Desktop Publishing software, and Outlook (both full version and web-based OWA access) to produce timely print and electronic communications for parents and the community.
Year 1:
50% by June 2007. Year 3: 70% by June 2009.Year 2:
60% by June 2008. Year 4: 80% by June 2010.Year 5:
90% by June 2011Objective: 3c By June 2011, 90% teachers, who attend professional development, will post students’ attendance, assignments and grades through a web-based system such as Aeries Browser Interface – Home Access and all parents that want access will be given a password and access instructions/training.
Annual Benchmarks
Year 1:
50% by June 2007. Year 3: 70% by June 2009.Year 2:
60% by June 2008. Year 4: 80% by June 2010.Year 5:
90% by June 2011(Objective 3a,b, c - Continued on next page)
Goal 3: Objective: 3a,b,c Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data
Instruments:
District records of the number of teachers trained to use Aeries Browser Interface – Home AccessData: % of teachers trained; % of parents requesting passwords and instructions; % of parents using this home access.
Instrument:
District and site based equipment and Outlook e-mail account recordsData: % of teachers with access
Instrument:
Communication artifacts from School and classroom websites.Data: evidence of efforts to improve two-way communication.
Data reviewers
District curriculum, data, and technology administrators and school admins. will analyze benchmark data annually in late August / September and make any necessary modifications in order to meet our objectives.
Goal 3: Objective: 3a,b,c Implementation Action Steps
Use of Technology
1. Annually, require administrator and teacher completion of pre and post EdTech Profile survey by all who participate in district-sponsored technology training programs.
2. Annually, in June, analyze EdTech Profile administrator and teacher student information/ data analyses results to plan for professional development offerings during the next school year.
3.
Annually in the fall, schedule and promote district sponsored technology workshops for administrators and for teachers on using Word and/ or Desktop publishing software to improve print communications with parents and community.4. Annually in the fall, schedule and promote district sponsored technology workshops for administrators and for teachers on all applicable Aeries components during the school year.
5. Annually in the fall, schedule and promote district sponsored technology workshops for administrators and for teachers during the school year on the district’s web-based student reporting system and Students at Risk procedures.
6. By fall 2007, schedule and promote district sponsored Outlook workshops for administrators and for teachers during the 2007-07school year with the objective of increasing proficiency in all needed aspects of Outlook and OWA.
7. Annually in the fall continue to schedule and promote district sponsored Outlook workshops for administrators and for teachers during the school year
Monitoring
District curriculum, data, and technology administrators and school site administrators track the development and implementation of all activities and accomplishments monthly and report progress at our monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to ensure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective.
Timeline:
The timeline for the aforementioned actions are included in the Implementation Action Steps listed above.Person(s) responsible
: District admins., the District Technology Director, school site admins, and site media specialists / mentors are responsible for the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of all the aforementioned activities. Site administrators and teachers are responsible for completing all necessary professional development and ensuring student instruction is based on standards-aligned objectives and research based programs, practices and arrangements.5. Infrastructure, Hardware, Software, & Technical Support
5a & 5b. Summary of current district technology hardware, electronic learning resources, networking and telecommunication infrastructure, physical plant modifications, and technical support and anticipated needs to support our tech plan objectives.
Current District Hardware
Existing hardware and electronic resources at each of our sites is included in Component 3a: Current Technology Access in our tech plan. This data comes from both our CBEDS data and our annual California School Technology Surveys.
The total number of Internet connected multi-media computers in the district (from 2005 California Tech Survey) is summarized in the chart below.
Elementary Schools
Junior High Schools
High Schools
K-12 Ind. Study, CDS & Spec. Ed.
District Total
59
1
64
0
124
District Equipment Replacement Chart
School Name
2005-06
Enrollment (Unofficial CBEDs)
# of current Instructional Multimedia computers / thin clients 4 years or newer in 2005 -06 CA. Tech Survey
# of new computers needed to reach
8 : 1 or better by June 2007
# of additional new computers needed to reach/ maintain goal of 4 : 1 in five years as per District objective.
Biggs Elementary
313
49
27
51
Richvale Elementary
53
10
7
6
Biggs Middle School
119
1
15
15
Biggs High School
239
64
30
30
CDS-Intermediate
3
0
1
0
CDS - HS
10
0
2
1
Current student to computer ratio = 6 : 1
District Hardware Needs During the Next Five Years
Improving student to up-to-date multi-media computer ratios is a moving target. As the district annually purchases new computers for its school sites, others are retired, making it difficult to obtain a student to computer homeostasis. To complicate the issue further, our student population fluctuates annually.
We will replace old computers and add to the numbers at each site to improve our student to computer ratios through new purchases that meet the CDE minimum recommended standards for new desktops, laptops, and thin client servers. We will also improve our student to computer ratios through our partnership with the non-profit Computers For Classrooms program, which provides the district, free of charge, with refurbished up-to-date multi-media computers that can be placed in service for a minimum of 3 years.
82 new computers (4years or newer in Spring 2007) to meet 8: 1 student to computer ratio
25 new computers (4years or newer in Spring 2008) to meet 7: 1 student to computer ratio
17 new computers (4years or newer in Spring 2009) to meet 6: 1 student to computer ratio
23 new computers (4years or newer in Spring 2010) to meet 5: 1 student to computer ratio
38 new computers (4years or newer in Spring 2011) to meet 4: 1 student to computer ratio
185 = Total number of new computers needed over the next five years: 2006-2011
(See chart on previous page for details.)
Additionally, we have an important need in the area of LCD projectors. There are presently only 6 LCD projectors in the district spread out across the sites. It is estimated (based on an informal survey, not a part of the tech. Survey) that half of the teachers would use such technology on a regular basis if it were available to them. Our plan is to have all interested teachers approach their SIP committees on site and ask for funds to purchase this technology for their individual classrooms. That is estimated to be a need of 15 new LCD projectors.
Current District Software
Elementary School Software Used:
Accelerated Reader, Renaissance Place, Reading Counts and SRI, Accelerated Math and Star Math, Math Blaster, Microsoft Office Suite, Internet resources, Aeries Student Information Systems and ABI, Edusoft integrated online assessment program, Eureka career software, Adobe Reader, a variety of grading programs, and CLRN approved curriculum based software.
Middle School Software Used:
Accelerated Reader, Accelerated Math, Reading Counts, Microsoft Office Suite Premium (including Word, Excel, Access, PowerPoint, FrontPage, PhotoEditor, Publisher, and Outlook), Internet resources, Eureka career software, Adobe Reader, a variety of grading programs such as GradeQuick and Grade Machine, Edusoft integrated online assessment program, Aeries Student Information Systems and ABI, and CLRN approved curriculum based software.
High School Software Used:
Accelerated Math, Microsoft Office Suite Premium (including Word, Excel, Access, PowerPoint, FrontPage, PhotoEditor, Publisher, and Outlook), Internet resources, Eureka career software, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Premiere, Adobe After Effects, MicroStation CAD Software, Adobe Encore, Adobe Reader, Aeries Student Information Systems and ABI, a variety of grading programs such as GradeQuick and Grade Machine, Edusoft integrated online assessment program, and CLRN approved curriculum based software.
District Software Needs During the Next Five Years
Additional district standardized and CLRN approved curriculum and intervention software and online services for English/Language Arts and Math for all K-12 grade levels.
Additional K-8 SBE adopted textbook publisher companion technology resources, particularly for English/Language Arts and Math.
Subscriptions to online research resources such as EBSCO and SIRS
CLRN approved assistive software as identified by Special Education teachers by the district
Upgrades to existing software versions as needed.
Current District Infrastructure, Site Networks, and Connectivity
Total Number of district schools = 6
Total Number of district schools connected to the Internet by a permanent (non-dial-up) connection = 6
Total Number of district schools connected to the Internet by:
Full T-1: 6
Total number of schools in the district that are NOT connected to the District’s LAN: 0
Average # of drops per classroom: 3
What percentage of schools is served by the following Internet service provider?
District office: 0%
County Office of Education 100%
California State University/University of California 0%
Commercial provider (e.g., Earthlink, MCI, Sprint, etc.) 0%
What percentage of classrooms in the district do not have a phone service in the classroom? 0%
What percentage of classrooms in the district do not have voicemail service? 0%
District Infrastructure Needs During the Next Five Years
Increase # of drops per classroom in those needed multiple drops, like mini-labs and small learning centers.
Replace network router, switches, and servers as needed; use the ERATE program as much as feasible to help offset the costs.
Add one server for AERIES ABI parent home connect program.
Increase wireless capabilities for "visiting laptops" and other devices as needed for students and teachers. Use wireless switches in concentrated areas of need such as computer labs and libraries.
Current District Tech Support
District Support includes a part-time District Technology Coordinator, multiple unpaid student technology assistants ("techies" as they are known), one paid "techie" who works both during school hours and after, as well as assistance from the County Office of Education Information Technology Services Department which provides infrastructure and hardware help for a yearly annual contract and fee.
The District Technology Coordinator and his "techies" are responsible for the following:
All Administrative, teacher, student, and lab computers, hardware and software.
Setting up all new computers for teachers and labs.
Minor Network infrastructure needs.
Coordinate District Ed Tech Program Implementation and Ed Tech Professional Development.
The County office of Education provides help in the following areas:
District Administrative software, specifically financial services and SELPA.
All network infrastructure, hardware, wiring, and software when the local tech support cannot handle the needs.
We have no "help desk" other than contacts at the County Office of Education. We have no specialist on-site for the student information system (Aeries) other than a lead secretary.
Type Of District Support Provided
Individuals Responsible
Ongoing equipment maintenance, repair, and replacement
Technical Support provided during school hours Technical support after school hours
Technology Integration Support
District Technology Coordinator
(1/2 FTE)
Student "techies", currently 5 students 1 hour per day each
1 pad student techie, 2 hours per day.
Emergency technology needs
Major Infrastructure maintenance and repair
County Office of Education, Information Technology Service Department
Technology Integration Support
District Technology Coordinator, CTAP Region 2
Type Of Site Support Provided
Individuals Responsible
Ongoing equipment maintenance and repair.
None at site level – Same as above for District-wide support.
Technical Support provided during school hours
Informally designated Site Tech Lead Teachers, Media specialists, students, volunteers
Technology Integration Support
Informally designated Site Tech Lead Teachers, Site admins, District Tech Coordinators, Media specialists, librarians, peer coaches.
District Tech Support Needs Over the Next Five Years
To support teachers participating in the district’s education technology professional development opportunities, the district will train and offer stipends to site-based technology integration mentors (peer coaches).
5. C & D Benchmarks, timelines, and monitoring process for new hardware, infrastructure, and software acquisitions.
Goal 1 - District Goal for Hardware and Software
Goal 1: All students will have access to up-to-date computers and appropriate software to support achievement of the academic standards in the classroom, district curricular goals, and ultimately for lifelong learning and success in our Digital society.
(Aligns to curriculum goals #1,2, & 4 in component 3)Specific Measurable Objective by June 30, 2011
Objective: 1a By June 30, 2011 our district average student to computer* ratio will be 4 to 1 or better. (*based on CDE defined up to date multimedia computer - four years old or newer).
Annual Benchmarks and Timeline:
Year 1:
8 students to 1 computer by June 2007. Year 3: 6 students to 1 computer by June 2009.
Year 2: 7 students to 1 computer by June 2008 Year 4: 5 students to 1 computer by June 2010Year 5: Maintain or improve
4 students to 1 computer by June 2011Objective: 1b By June 30, 2011 90% k-12 core curriculum classrooms (E/LA, Math, History/Social Science, Science) will have access to district approved CLRN and/or SBE approved curriculum-based learning and intervention software and/or internet subscriptions.
Annual Benchmarks and Timeline:
Year 1:
70% by June 2007 Year 3: 80% by June 2009Year 2: 75% by June 2008 Year 4: 85% by June 2010
Year 5: 90% by June 2011
Monitoring and Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data
Instrument:
Annual CBEDS:Data: average student to computer ratio by school and district wide
Instrument:
Annual California Online Tech Survey:Data: average student to computer ratio by school.
Instrument:
Annual district technology software surveyData: % of classrooms with access to approved curriculum based software
Monitoring and Evaluation Process:
The District Technology Coordinator and school site administrators will track the development and implementation of all appropriate access activities, inventories and accomplishments monthly and report progress at our monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to ensure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective. District Technology Coordinator and school site admins. will analyze end of school year results annually in June.
5. C & D Benchmarks, timelines, and monitoring process for new hardware, infrastructure, and software acquisitions.
Goal 2 - District Goal for Infrastructure
Goal 2: To support teachers participating in the district’s education technology professional development opportunities, the district will train and offer stipends to site-based technology integration mentors (peer coaches).
(Aligns to curriculum goal #4 in component 3)
Specific Measurable Objective by June 30, 2011
Objective: 2a By June 2011, 100% of the school sites will have a site-based technology integration mentor (peer coach).
Annual Benchmarks and Timeline:
Year 1:
60% by June 2007 Year 3: 80% by June 2009Year 2: 70% by June 2008 Year 4: 90% by June 2010
Year 5: 100% by June 2011
Monitoring and Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data
Instrument:
Annual California Online Tech Survey:Data: % of teachers trained at high levels and serving as technology peer mentors, and levels of assistance to teachers needing technology integration in the classroom.
Monitoring and Evaluation Process:
The District Technology Coordinator and school site administrators will track the development of site-level peer mentors and implementation of the training of these coaches via level of participation in the CTAP Online Professional Development program. District Technology Coordinator, school site admins. will analyze end of school year results annually in June.
5. C & D Benchmarks, timelines, and monitoring process for new hardware, infrastructure, and software acquisitions.
Goal 3 - District Goal for Technical Support
EXAMPLE: Goal 3: All school sites in district will have access to timely district technical support so teachers and students have access to technology needed to support standards in the classroom, district curricular goals, and ultimately for lifelong learning and success in our Digital society. (Aligns to curriculum goal #4 in component 3)
Specific Measurable Objective by June 30, 2011
Objective: 3a By June 2008, the district will have a standardized Information Technology Services (ITS) work order process and tracking system in place.
Annual Benchmarks and Timeline:
Year 1:
Planning and development completed by June 2007 Year 3: Monitor and if necessary revise work order process by 2009Year 2: Implementation and Beta testing by June 2008 Year 4: Continue to monitor and if necessary revise work order process by June 2010
Year 5: Continue to monitor and if necessary revise work order process by June 2011
Objective: 3b By June 2011, the district will have ITS computer, software, and network security standards in place for district supported technology.(ie. Virus protection, DeepFreeze software and Windows policies, web content filtering standards, Spam Blocking)
Annual Benchmarks and Timeline:
Year 1:
60% by June 2007 Year 3: _80%by June 2009Year 2: 70% by June 2008 Year 4: 90% by June 2010
Year 5: 100% by June 2011
Monitoring and Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data
Instrument:
District ITS Polices and Procedures handbookData: Standardized work order process and security standards for computers and networks.
Monitoring and Evaluation Process:
The District Technology Coordinator and school site administrators will track the development and implementation of all appropriate access activities, inventories and accomplishments monthly and report progress at our monthly district/ site admin meetings. Modifications to our district activities will be made as needed in order to ensure that we meet or exceed this measurable objective. District Technology Coordinator and school site admins. will analyze end-of-school-year results annually in June.
6. Ed. Technology Funding & Budget
The BUSD technology plan is highly affected by national and statewide economic conditions. The availability of grants and the extent of state and national budgets for schools, specifically for technology, will have an influence on the implementation of this plan. However, we considered the curricular goals and needs for our school district and developed a budget for the duration of this five-year plan.
The District pays for:
The salary and any benefits for the District Technology Coordinator and the paid student assistant, which includes a majority of the tech help support needs for the district
Local Area Network (LAN) contract with Butte County Office of Education, Information Technology Services Department, for technical assistance on the LAN, infrastructure, updates, and other technical support for the network.
The Aeries student information system implementation & growth of application of components
Internet Service Provider fees, WAN contract with the provider
Other equipment/tools used by the Information Services department, such as replacement parts, testing and repair tools, software tools, etc.
In some cases, school site budgets also pay for educational software, computers & peripherals, etc.
Discounts from the Calif Teleconnect Fund (DAS) and Erate grants assist to pay for infrastructure upgrades, electronics & data circuits.
The EETT-Formula budget pays for facilitation, mentoring, and stipends for:
Teacher technology staff development to meet curricular goals (basic and integration proficiencies) (mostly in the form of stipends)
CTAP provides in-kind coordinator time to assist with Technology Plan implementation and pays subscription fees for all BUSD schools and faculty to use the CTAP Online staff development system. CTAP also offers fall and spring after-school technology workshops (for a fee) and a two-day Summer Teaching and Leadership Collaborative conference at the CSUC campus each summer (for a fee) that help us meet our technology plan objectives.
Regarding the continued need for up-to-date student and teacher computers (4 years old or newer) and for site technical help, these are the biggest budget challenges for technology in our district. District and Site budgets from various sources help pay for needed hardware. In addition, the Computers For Classrooms (CFC) program collects used computers from State agencies, refurbishes them, loads licensed software, and sells the computers to BUSD for a nominal fee.
Budget Assumptions:
District-paid and site-paid tech support will continue at the same level.
DAS/CPUC/CA Teleconnect Fund and the Federal E-rate program will continue throughout the duration of the Ed tech plan.
EETT Formula grant funds will continue at approximately the same funding rate throughout the duration of the Ed tech plan.
EETT Competitive grant continues to be available to grades 4-8 upon successful grant application approval.
There will not be any state or district budget freezes for the duration of our Tech Plan.
The volunteer nonprofit Computers for Classrooms computer-refurbishing program will continue throughout the duration of the plan.
School site budgets and Title 1 funds will fund some of the site-specific hardware, software, professional development, and tech support outlined in the plan.
Technology funding and budget planning will take place on an ongoing basis guided by the goals and objectives of this plan.
The following priorities exist for BUSD for the duration of this plan:
Technical support to teachers, administrators, and support staff
Staff development (for teachers, administrators and support staff) for personal technology skills and use and incorporation into the classroom/curriculum
Staff development for Edusoft and continued development of technology-assisted, data-driven student assessment and decision-making.
Replacement and repair of teacher and student computers
Upgrades to infrastructure
6A. Established and Potential Funding Sources
List of established and potential funding sources and cost savings, present and future.
(See chart on following page)
6A. Established and Potential Funding Sources and Amounts for Hardware, Software, Infrastructure and Training
source
pays for
ongoing
1 -time
potential
y1
y2
y3
y4
y5
Subs, stipends, conferences
x
$ 13,000
$ 13,000
$ 13,000
$ 13,000
$ 13,000
Dist ed tech budget
equip, diagnostics, tools, extra help, etc.
x
53,000
53,000
53,000
53,000
53,000
Student Record Keeping/ Assessment?
annual maintenance fees, in-service
x
4,330
4,330
4,330
4,330
4,330
Site budgets, incl. SIP
Various including hardware & ELR
x
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
DAS
Cal Teleconnect Fund 50% abated into acct
x
0
0
0
0
0
ERATE
Discounts only
x
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
Title I district
various
x
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Title I site
various
x
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Title II Part A
various
x
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
EETT-F
in-service, hardware,
x
1,283
potential
potential
potential
potential
EETT-C
(BUSD has not been eligible yet)
in-service, computers, tech help, etc.
x
0
0
0
0
0
Any Local Measures
tech infrastructure, comm sys & elec upgrades
x
0
0
0
0
0
CTAP Reg.2 & CTAP online – in kind
CTAP online, coordinator time, tech training
x
$2000
$2000
$2000
$2000
$2000
K-12 voucher pgm
x
potential
potential
potential
potential
potential
Beaumont Foundation
x
potential
potential
potential
potential
potential
Other Grants
x
potential
potential
potential
potential
potential
Total Known District Ed Tech Funding / Discounts for year one
$120,613
*Funding amounts are estimates only
6B. Estimate of Tech Plan Implementation Costs for District’s Five Year Plan.
With funding limited and unpredictable, the budget plan is designed to project total costs of the five-year plan.
Category
Description Item/category
Cost
BUSD cost Yr1 Including ERATE discount
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Total BUSD cost estimate Years 1-5
Estimated annual ERATE discount (at 80%) where eligible
Substitutes and stipends for staff development, teacher extra assignment pay hired for district wide tech integration coordinator position.
$ 34,790
$ 34,790
$ 34,790
$ 34,790
$ 34,790
$173,950
---
2000-2999 - Classified Salaries
Tech Support (Student Techie)
720
720
720
720
720
3,600
---
3000-3999 - Employee Benefits
Benefits for certificated and classified
4,214
4,214
4,214
4,214
4,214
21,070
---
Misc. Infrastructure, servers, cabling, electronics, network devices
33,559
33,559
33,559
33,559
33,559
167,795
32,000
185 Computers over 5 years – We will supplement new computer purchases with "Computers for Schools" refurbished / and nearly used computers as needed to meet our student:computer ratios
18,000
16,717
16,717
16,717
16,717
84,868
---
Printers, LCD Projectors
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
25,000
---
ELRS and productivity software
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
10,000
---
Aeries Student Information System
4,330
4,330
4,330
4,330
4,330
21,650
---
5000 -5999 Services, operating expenses, travel
Staff Development Training, LAN/WAN Contract Services
18,000
18,000
18,000
18,000
18,000
90,000
8,000
6000-6999-
Capitol Outlay if over $10,000 purchased at one time (Computers, new)
0
0
0
0
0
0
---
TOTALS
$120,613
$119.330
$119.330
$119.330
$119.330
$597,933
$40,000 ERATE Discounts per year
(Note, BUSD accounting rules states that one item would have to total over $5,000 to be considered capital outlay therefore all computer and related equipment herein is considered a category 4000 purchase.)
We will implement our five-year technology plan with our known annual technology budget and new funding opportunities that may arise. We plan to set aside a minimum of 25% of our annual technology plan budget for professional development with the remaining 75% going toward hardware, software, infrastructure, and technical support.
6c. Level of Ongoing District Technical Support
The district has no computer technicians hired, per se, however there is one District Wide Technology Coordinator and one student, who serve in the capacities of district-wide and site-level computer technicians part time. This equates to ½ FTE computer technician offering tech support to schools, currently serving at total district inventory of 230 computers (124 "newer" and 106 "older" computers, older than 4 years), which equates to one FTE for every 460 computers in the district. In addition to the District Technical Support information in Component 5 (a,b,c,d) of our tech plan, the district will train and offer stipends to site-based technology integration support mentors (peer coaches) to assist teachers participating in the district’s education technology professional development opportunities.
6d. District’s Replacement Policy for Obsolete Equipment
The district replacement policy for obsolete equipment is every five years Our district computer replacement budget is 10% per year of our technology budget. Our resources are scarce for computer replacement costs so we rely heavily upon grants for this purpose.
6e. District’s Budget and Funding Monitoring Process
Our district is committed to a dependable and sustainable technology plan that ensures funding for reliable infrastructure, hardware, technical support, professional development, and software for all district sites.
The District Technology Coordinator has the primary responsibility and access to appropriate budgets to meet goals and objectives specified in this plan. District budget and funding monitoring is the responsibility of the district superintendent, as advised by the BUSD District Technology Coordinator who takes budget recommendations and revision requests to administration and the School Board as needed. Routine district budget analyses and funding opportunities are tracked to ensure optimal leveraging of funds. Site technology budgets are the domain of site principals and school site councils.
The District Technology Coordinator researches the ongoing data on technology replacement, upgrade, maintenance, and technical support needs including the annual California School Survey data provided by all sites in the district.
7. Monitoring & Evaluation of Technology Plan
7. a. - Description of how technology’s impact on student learning and attainment of the district’s curricular goals, as well as classroom and school management, will be evaluated.
7. b. - Schedule for evaluating the effect of plan implementation.
7. c. - Description of how the information obtained through the monitoring and evaluation will be used.
In order to maintain the accuracy and relevance of our Education Technology Plan, it is essential to monitor and, if necessary, revise each component of this plan on an ongoing basis. Ongoing collection of data and the use of that data to inform decision-making is embedded into each objective in our tech plan components under the monitoring and evaluation sections in our plan Criteria components 3, 4, & 5.
Each identified objective in our Technology Plan will be reviewed and evaluated monthly by the District Technology Coordinator who has the overarching responsibility for ensuring that our goals and objectives are monitored, adjusted as necessary, and accomplished and by our Technology Advisory Team.
The district’s core Technology Advisory Team is comprised of the District Superintendent, District Technology Coordinator, school site administrators, site-based technology coaches, teachers. The Technology Advisory Team will track the development and implementation of all activities and accomplishments monthly. Tech Planning issues, successes and setbacks will be communicated between the Technology Advisory Team via e-mail and voice-mail on an ongoing basis. Data, progress, and any needed revisions to the plan will be reviewed during six Technology Advisory Team meetings during the school year (one every other month). In addition, progress reports on the District Technology Plan objectives will continue to be a standing agenda item at our district/ site admin elementary and secondary school meetings.
The following chart specifies who is responsible for the monitoring and evaluation activities and an approximate amount of monthly work to be spent on the activities.
Job Title(s) of Responsible Individual(s)
Responsibilities
Monthly FTE Time Estimate
District Technology Coordinator
Provide overall Tech Plan management and coordination
.05
District Superintendent
Manage, coordinate, and assess curriculum-based technology staff development
.05
District Technology Coordinator
Assess, plan, implement, monitor, and evaluate technology integration staff development aligned to curriculum. Provide support to site-based technology coaches.
.1
District Technology Coordinator
Standardize, develop, manage, monitor, and revise as necessary network, hardware, infrastructure, software, and technical support specifications, policies, and procedures.
.05
District Technology Coordinator
Collect staff development data on technology proficiencies through the completion of the EdTechProfile.(EdTech Profile)
.05
District Superintendent
Coordinate ongoing partner involvement with community and private schools.
.05
Site Technology Coaches
Collect and analyze data regarding K-12 students’computer skills and students’ academic achievement
.05
Site Administrators
Provide and / or facilitate necessary Ed Tech professional development for the sites based on data.
.05
District Technology Coordinator
Collect data regarding staff development focused on teaching students computer and information literacy skills
.05
Site-based Technology Coaches
Collect data regarding staff development focused on integration of technology into the curriculum to improve academic achievement
.05
District Technology Coordinator
Use collected data to monitor and evaluate progress toward benchmarks and the timeline and to plan and make modifications.
.05
Site-based Technology Coaches
Collect annual California School Technology Survey data and assist with pre and post EdTech Profile completion.
.05
8. Adult Literacy and Technology
Criteria 8: Effective Collaborative Strategies with Adult Literacy Providers to Maximize the Use of Technology
The Biggs Unified School District does not currently provide an adult literacy program. However, plans to begin a program are being made with the assistance of the Butte County Library Adult Reading Program. The primary focus of the district’s adult education program is to provide assistance and instruction for the completion high school diploma and G.E.D. requirements. Other Adult Education alternative programs are being explored as well.
During the fall of 2006, the Biggs Unified School District Technology Committee will meet with adult literacy providers to share information about our technology plan, to learn how they are currently incorporating technology into their classes, and to discover how we may collaborate to better provide services to our students, their parents, and the general community. Possible assistance may include pursuing adult literacy funding sources to enhance the use of technology in adult literacy.
A proposed adult literacy program will incorporate the use the community rooms and books provided by the Butte County Library and possible school sites that could house community-reading rooms. The sites’ library technician will be available to assist adult literacy providers with incorporating the use of the school site’s technology into the literacy programs.
If available, a proposed program will begin with a community needs and interest assessment by the Adult Reading Program Library Literacy Specialist for the Butte County Library. The assessment will be conducted as part of family reading nights, sponsored by the Title I teaching staff at each school site. In addition to the literacy specialist and the Title I teaching staff, the district Elementary Library/Technology/Coordinator will be involved in the project.
The program would consist of basic literacy instruction in English to adults who ordinarily speak English, and who are not being served by other educational programs. Trained volunteers, under professional supervision, will provide one-on-one tutoring for beginning level reading, writing, spelling, and on occasion math skills. The program will be adult learner goal-oriented and will provide life skills materials as well as referral to other literacy and social service providers. Materials are to be provided by the Butte County Library and the sites housing the community reading rooms. Adult learners, who have preschool-age children, will be offered special activities and materials to introduce the entire family to the value and joy of reading together.
9. Effective, Research-Based Strategies
9a Description of how education technology strategies and proven methods for student learning, teaching, and technology management are based on relevant research and effective practices:
9b. Description of thorough and thoughtful examination of externally or locally developed education technology models and strategies.
Our technology plan lists clear goals and strategies for integrating technology into the curriculum to improve student learning in the specific areas of English/ Language Arts and Math. The learning objectives are based on the California State Academic Content Standards. The following relevant research was examined and integrated into our plan. The research we selected emphasizes best practices for technology integration in the curriculum, Total Cost of Ownership, and important factors that contribute to successful staff development.
Biggs Unified School District’s philosophy is that the use of technology should be integrated into the curriculum at all levels in order to improve student achievement. Technology should not be a separate content taught for its own sake. Technology improves student performances when the application directly supports the curriculum objectives being assessed. Alignment of project or lesson content with state content standards is an important first step in infusing technology into the curricula. A survey of 465 teachers in California resulted in 92% affirming that the starting point in infusing technology into the curriculum is having information about the specific content of a program or use of an application that aligns with state-adopted curriculum standards. A number of respondents indicated that an online resource that profiles electronic learning resources with the specific skills and knowledge in areas that align with the content standards would facilitate the selection of programs enabling the integration of technology with the curriculum (Cradler & Beuthel, 2001)
In an ACOT study student engagement remained highest when technology use was integrated into the larger curricular framework, rather than being an "add-on" to an already full curriculum (Sandholz et al, 1997). Research suggests that when technology is integrated into the larger instructional framework, students will gain both technical expertise and content knowledge (Silverstain et al, 2000) Moreover, using technology within the curricular framework can enhance important skills valued in the workplace, such as locating and accessing information, organizing and displaying data, and creating persuasive arguments (Sandholtz et al, 1997; "Critical Issue," 1999)
While our district does offer some basic technology courses, technology integration will not be taught in isolation. Staff development has, and will continue to emphasize the use of technology as a powerful teaching and learning tool that engages students while addressing content standards within the curricular, instructional framework and adopted curriculum.
The Learning Return On Our Educational Technology Investment: A Review of Findings from Research, WestED (Ringstaff and Kelley, June 2002) is an extensive report that examines many studies related to educational technology and school reform. Several key factors are identified a crucial elements for successfully using technology:
·
Technology is best used as one component in a broad-based reform effort·
Teachers must be adequately trained to use technology·
Teachers may need to change their beliefs about teaching and learning·
Technological resources must be sufficient and accessible·
Effective technology use requires long-term planning and support·
Technology should be integrated into the instructional frameworkThese key elements are addressed in several places in our Technology Plan. They are best found in the areas aligning technology with curricular and professional development goals emphasizing technology-enhanced, standards-based curricular lessons and units.
Our revised Education Technology Plan 2006-2011 includes all the research-based best practices integrated in:
http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg35.html#sec2414 The EETT Technology Plan research-based requirements for formula and competitive grant applications for Title II, Part D in No Child Left Behind.
Education Technology Planning: A Guide for School Districts.
California's research-based guidelines for district-level educational technology planning. http://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/et/rd/edtechguide.aspCOSN, Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
TCO Tool offers schools a formalized process for assessing the costs of managing their technology investments. Costs for wireless communications, voice/data integration and e-learning.
http://classroomtco.cosn.org/gartner_intro.html
In our district technology plan, professional development is a primary focus and CTAP Online (www.ctaponline.org) is at the heart of our technology skill and integration professional development program. In September of 2002, the California Department of Education released the document: Learning…Teaching…Leading…Report of the Professional Development Task Force (http://www.cde.ca.gov/re/pn/fd/documents/learnteachlead.pdf) which contained 10 recommendations for developing a comprehensive, aligned, and integrated statewide system of professional development that will sustain the continued growth of a highly-qualified teacher and administrator workforce. Among the recommendations, CTAP Online web-based professional development portal was specifically identified as the primary example of a, "… Web-based support system for teachers and administrators that is available at all times and includes standards-based curriculum resources, professional development resources, and facilitated online training." (pp 37-38, Learning…Teaching…Leading.)
In addition CTAP Online matches up against the design elements for high quality professional development as outlined in the Designs for Learning. Designs for Learning was developed by the California Professional Development Reform Initiative, which was sponsored by the California Department of Education with support from the California Professional Development Consortia, the Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning, the California Staff Development Council, and the New Teacher Center. http://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ps/te/designs4lrng.asp
9c. Description of development and utilization of innovative strategies for using technology to deliver rigorous academic courses and curricula, including distance-learning technologies.
The Biggs Unified School District is examining ways to deliver curriculum and professional development using new, innovative, technology-based tools. Our technology plan integrates the development of innovative strategies for using technology including the use of standards-based report cards, and free or low-cost Internet resources for students, teachers, and administrators.
Our district is committed to increasing course offerings through the use of technology. The district uses and is expanding the use of online AP courses for high school students. The district is also investigating video conferencing capabilities at school sites in order to enhance instruction through collaborative learning projects, to deliver courses from different sites, to allow for students and teachers to collaborate with peers and experts.
We will continue to work with CTAP Region 2 and our County Office of Education to explore use of the High Speed Network to deliver rigorous academic curricula online to our middle and high school students. Through our partnership with CTAP Region 2 we have free access to an online course builder to provide our instructional staff with district-specific extended high-quality professional development on technology and curriculum integration expanding our current face-to-face district staff development offerings.
Appendix C
Criteria for EETT-Funded Education Technology Plans
In order to be approved, a technology plan needs to have "Adequately Addressed" each of the following criteria:
For corresponding EETT Requirements, see Appendix F.
If the technology plan is revised, insert the Education Technology Plan Benchmark Review Form (Appendix I) at the beginning of the technology plan.
Include this form (Appendix C) with "Page in District Plan" completed at the end of your technology plan.
1.
PLAN DURATION CRITERIONPage in District Plan
Example of Adequately Addressed
Example of Not Adequately Addressed
a.
The plan should guide the district’s use of education technology for the next three to five years.7The education technology plan describes the districts use of education technology for the next three to five years.
The plan is less than three years or more than five years in length.
2.
STAKEHOLDERS CRITERION3.
Corresponding EETT Requirement(s): 7 & 11 (Appendix F)Page in District Plan
Example of Adequately Addressed
Not Adequately Addressed
a.
Description of how a variety of stakeholders from within the school district and the community-at-large participated in the planning process. 7 - 10The planning team consisted of representatives who will implement the plan. If a variety of stakeholders did not assist with the development of the plan, a description of why they were not involved is included.
Little evidence is included that shows that the district actively sought participation from a variety of stakeholders.
4.
CURRICULUM COMPONENT CRITERIA5.
Corresponding EETT Requirement(s): 1, 2, 3, 8, 10, & 12 (Appendix F)Page in District Plan
Example of Adequately Addressed
Example of Not Adequately Addressed
a. Description of teachers’ and students’ current access to technology tools both during the school day and outside of school hours.
11 - 15
The plan describes the technology access available in the classrooms, library/media centers, or labs for all students and teachers.
The plan explains technology access in terms of a student-to-computer ratio, but does not explain where access is available, who has access, and when various students and teachers can use the technology.
b. Description of the district’s current use of hardware and software to support teaching and learning.
11 - 15
The plan describes the typical frequency and type of use (technology skills/information literacy/integrated into the curriculum).
The plan cites district policy regarding use of technology, but provides no information about its actual use.
c. Summary of the district’s curricular goals and academic content standards in various district and site comprehensive planning documents.
16 - 17
The plan references other district documents that guide the curriculum and/or establish goals and standards.
The plan does not reference district curriculum goals.
d. List of clear goals and a specific implementation plan for using technology to improve teaching and learning by supporting the district curricular goals and academic content standards.
19
The plan delineates clear, specific, and realistic goals and target groups for using technology to support the district’s curriculum goals and academic content standards to improve learning. The implementation plan clearly supports accomplishing the goals.
The plan suggests how technology will be used, but is not specific enough to know what action needs to be taken to accomplish the goals.
e. List of clear goals and a specific implementation plan detailing how and when students will acquire technology and information literacy skills needed to succeed in the classroom and the workplace.
21
For the focus areas, the plan delineates clear, specific and realistic goals for using technology to help students acquire technology and information literacy skills. The implementation plan clearly supports accomplishing the goals.
The plan suggests how technology will be used, but is not specific enough to determine what action needs to be taken to accomplish the goals.
f. List of clear goals and a specific implementation plan for programs and methods of utilizing technology that ensure appropriate access to all students.
21
For the focus areas, the plan delineates clear, specific and realistic goals for using technology to support the progress of all students. The implementation plan clearly supports accomplishing the goals.
The plan suggests how technology will be used, but is not specific enough to know what action needs to be taken to accomplish the goals.
g. List of clear goals and a specific implementation plan to utilize technology to make student record keeping and assessment more efficient and supportive of teachers’ efforts to meet individual student academic needs.
27
The plan delineates clear, specific and realistic goals for using technology to support the district’s student record-keeping and assessment efforts. The implementation plan clearly supports accomplishing the goals.
The plan suggests how technology will be used, but is not specific enough to know what action needs to be taken to accomplish the goals.
h. List of clear goals and a specific implementation plan to utilize technology to make teachers and administrators more accessible to parents.
30
The plan delineates clear, specific and realistic goals for using technology to facilitate improved two-way communication between home and school. The implementation plan clearly supports accomplishing the goals.
The plan suggests how technology will be used, but is not specific enough to know what action needs to be taken to accomplish the goals.
i. List of benchmarks and a timeline for implementing planned strategies and activities.
19 – 32
The benchmarks and timeline are specific and realistic. Teachers, administrators and students implementing the plan can easily discern what steps will be taken, by whom, and when.
The benchmarks and timeline are either absent or so vague that it would be difficult to determine what should occur at any particular time.
j. Description of the process that will be used to monitor whether the strategies and methodologies utilizing technology are being implemented according to the benchmarks and timeline.
21 - 32
The monitoring process is described in sufficient detail so that who is responsible, and what is expected is clear.
The monitoring process is either absent, or lacks detail regarding who is responsible and what is expected.
6.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT CRITERIA7.
Corresponding EETT Requirement(s): 5 & 12 (Appendix F)Page in District Plan
Example of Adequately Addressed
Example of Not Adequately Addressed
a. Summary of the teachers’ and administrators’ current technology skills and needs for professional development.
33 – 34
The plan provides a clear summary of the teachers’ and administrators’ current technology skills and needs for professional development. The findings are summarized in the plan by discrete skills to facilitate providing professional development that meets the identified needs and plan goals.
Description of current level of staff expertise is too general or relates only to a limited segment of the district’s teachers and administrators in the focus areas or does not relate to the focus areas, i.e., only the fourth grade teachers when grades four to eight are the focus grade levels.
b. List of clear goals and a specific implementation plan for providing professional development opportunities based on the needs assessment and the Curriculum Component goals, benchmarks, and timeline.
35
The plan delineates clear, specific and realistic goals for providing teachers and administrators with sustained, ongoing professional development necessary to implement the Curriculum Component of the plan. The implementation plan clearly supports accomplishing the goals.
The plan speaks only generally of professional development and is not specific enough to ensure that teachers and administrators will have the necessary training to implement the Curriculum Component.
c. List of benchmarks and a timeline for implementing planned strategies and activities.
37
The benchmarks and timeline are specific and realistic. Teachers and administrators implementing the plan can easily discern what steps will be taken, by whom, and when.
The benchmarks and timeline are either absent or so vague that it would be difficult to determine what steps will be taken, by whom, and when.
d. Description of the process that will be used to monitor whether the professional development goals are being met and whether the planned professional development activities are being implemented in accordance with the benchmarks and timeline.
38 – 42
The monitoring process is described in sufficient detail so that who is responsible and what is expected is clear.
The monitoring process is either absent, or lacks detail regarding who is responsible and what is expected.
8.
INFRASTRUCTURE, HARDWARE, TECHNICAL SUPPORT, AND SOFTWARE COMPONENT CRITERIAPage in District Plan
Example of Adequately Addressed
Example of Not Adequately Addressed
a.
Describe the technology hardware, electronic learning resources, networking and telecommunications infrastructure, physical plant modifications, and technical support needed by the district’s teachers, students, and administrators to support the activities in the Curriculum and Professional Development Components of the plan.43 - 46
The plan clearly summarizes the technology hardware, electronic learning resources, networking and telecommunications infrastructure, physical plant modifications, and technical support proposed to support the implementation of the district’s Curriculum and Professional Development Components. The plan also includes the list of items to be acquired, which may be included as an appendix.
The plan includes a description or list of hardware, infrastructure and other technology necessary to implement the plan, but there doesn’t seem to be any real relationship between the activities in the Curriculum and Professional Development Components and the listed equipment. Future technical support needs have not been addressed or do not relate to the needs of the Curriculum and Professional Development Components.
b.
Describe the existing hardware, Internet access, electronic learning resources, and technical support already in the district that could be used to support the Curriculum and Professional Development Components of the plan.43
The plan clearly summarizes the existing technology hardware, electronic learning resources, networking and telecommunication infrastructure, and technical support to support the implementation of the Curriculum and Professional Development Components. The current level of technical support is clearly explained.
The inventory of equipment is so general that it is difficult to determine what must be acquired to implement the Curriculum and Professional Development Components. The summary of current technical support is missing or lacks sufficient detail.
c.
List of clear benchmarks and a timeline for obtaining the hardware, infrastructure, learning resources and technical support required to support the other plan components.44 - 49
The benchmarks and timeline are specific and realistic. Teachers and administrators implementing the plan can easily discern what needs to be acquired or repurposed, by whom, and when.
The benchmarks and timeline are either absent or so vague that it would be difficult to determine what needs to be acquired or repurposed, by whom, and when.
d.
Description of the process that will be used to monitor whether the goals and benchmarks are being reached within the specified time frame.47 - 49
The monitoring process is described in sufficient detail so that who is responsible and what is expected is clear.
The monitoring process is either absent, or lacks detail regarding who is responsible and what is expected.
9.
FUNDING AND BUDGET COMPONENT CRITERIA10.
Corresponding EETT Requirement(s): 7 & 13, (Appendix F)Page in District Plan
Example of Adequately Addressed
Example of Not Adequately Addressed
a.
List of established and potential funding sources and cost savings, present and future.50 – 54
The plan clearly describes resources* that are available or could be obtained to implement the plan. The process for identifying future funding sources is described.
Resources to implement the plan are not identified or are so general as to be useless.
b.
Estimate implementation costs for the term of the plan (three to five years).53
Cost estimates are reasonable and address the total cost of ownership.
Cost estimates are unrealistic, lacking, or are not sufficiently detailed to determine if the total cost of ownership is addressed.
c.
Description of the level of ongoing technical support the district will provide.54
The plan describes the level of technical support that will be provided for implementation given current resources and describes goals for additional technical support should new resources become available. The level of technical support is based on some logical unit of measure.
The description of the ongoing level of technical support is either vague or not included, is so inadequate that successful implementation of the plan is unlikely, or is so unrealistic as to raise questions of the viability of sustaining that level of support.
d.
Description of the district’s replacement policy for obsolete equipment.54
Plan recognizes that equipment will need to be replaced and outlines a realistic replacement plan that will support the Curriculum and Professional Development Components.
Replacement policy is either missing or vague. It is not clear that the replacement policy could be implemented.
e.
Description of the feedback loop used to monitor progress and update funding and budget decisions.54
The monitoring process is described in sufficient detail so that who is responsible, and what is expected is clear.
The monitoring process is either absent, or lacks detail regarding who is responsible and what is expected.
* In this document, the term "resources" means funding, in-kind services, donations, or other items of value.
11.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION COMPONENT CRITERIA12.
Corresponding EETT Requirement(s): 11 (Appendix F)Page in District Plan
Example of Adequately Addressed
Example of Not Adequately Addressed
a. Description of how technology’s impact on student learning and attainment of the district’s curricular goals, as well as classroom and school management, will be evaluated.
55 – 56
The plan describes the process for evaluation utilizing the goals and benchmarks of each component as the indicators of success.
No provision for an evaluation is included in the plan. How success is determined is not defined. The evaluation is defined, but the process to conduct the evaluation is missing.
b. Schedule for evaluating the effect of plan implementation.
55 – 56
Evaluation timeline is specific and realistic.
The evaluation timeline is not included or indicates an expectation of unrealistic results that does not support the continued implementation of the plan.
c. Description of how the information obtained through the monitoring and evaluation will be used.
55 - 56
The plan describes a process to report the monitoring and evaluation results to persons responsible for implementing and modifying the plan, as well as to the plan stakeholders.
The plan does not provide a process for using the monitoring and evaluation results to improve the plan and/or disseminate the findings.
13.
EFFECTIVE COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIES WITH ADULT LITERACY PROVIDERS TO MAXIMIZE THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY CRITERION14.
Corresponding EETT Requirement(s): 11 (Appendix F)Page in District Plan
Example of Adequately Addressed
Example of Not Adequately Addressed
a. If the district has identified adult literacy providers, there is a description of how the program will be developed in collaboration with those providers.
57
The plan explains how the program will be developed in collaboration with adult literacy providers. Planning included or will include consideration of collaborative strategies and other funding resources to maximize the use of technology. If no adult literacy providers are indicated, the plan describes the process used to identify adult literacy providers.
There is no evidence that the plan has been, or will be developed in collaboration with adult literacy service providers, to maximize the use of technology.
15.
EFFECTIVE, RESEARCHED-BASED METHODS, STRATEGIES, AND CRITERIA16.
Corresponding EETT Requirement(s): 4 & 9 (Appendix F)Page in District Plan
Example of Adequately Addressed
Not Adequately Addressed
a. Description of how education technology strategies and proven methods for student learning, teaching, and technology management are based on relevant research and effective practices.
58 – 59
The plan describes the relevant research behind the plan’s design for strategies and/or methods selected.
The description of the research behind the plan’s design for strategies and/or methods selected is unclear or missing.
b. Description of thorough and thoughtful examination of externally or locally developed education technology models and strategies.
58 – 59
The plan describes references to research literature that supports why or how the model improves student achievement.
No research is cited.
c. Description of development and utilization of innovative strategies for using technology to deliver rigorous academic courses and curricula, including distance-learning technologies (particularly in areas that would not otherwise have access to such courses or curricula due to geographical distances or insufficient resources).
59
The plan describes the process for development and utilization of strategies to use technology to deliver specialized or rigorous academic courses and curricula, including distance learning.
There is no plan to utilize technology to extend or supplement the district’s curriculum offerings